Re: Scientific Proof of the Great Flood

On 1 Sep 2005 20:57:25 -0700, "Ray Martinez" <pyramidial@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote in news:<1125633445.586137.312930@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Augray wrote:
> > On 1 Sep 2005 12:26:41 -0700, "Ray Martinez" <pyramidial@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote in news:<1125602801.791633.83970@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > > I know all about a hose and prisms.
> > >
> > > Genesis is saying that the natural phenomenon was created by God as a
> > > sign that He would not destroy by flood ever again.
> >
> > Vertebrate eyes require the same physical laws to function as those that
> > result in the rainbow. If the laws of physics were different in
> > antediluvian times, were eyes different as well?
> >
> >
> > > Nobody can prove that it did not rain prior to 3145 BC.
> > >
> > > Rainbow = proof of Great Flood = deny = not loyal to evidence.
> > >
> > >
> > > Ray Martinez
>
> Your post assumes uniformitarian nonsense that the present is the key
> to the past.

You make similar assumptions.


> The Old world was very different.

Were eyes different too?


> If you were standing on a bridge looking down at the water beneath,
> prior to 3145 BC if you looked up you would see the same thing - a
> water canopy.

Hardly. What kept the water up there?


> This canopy emitted a continual mist that watered the ground and
> prevented the harmful rays of the sun from getting through. This is one
> fact which explains the length of life back then.

What is your evidence that harmful rays from the sun place a significant
limit human life? Wouldn't a substantial amount of mist limit visible
light as well?


> Many persons have pointed out that it could never rain hard enough over
> 40 days to flood the earth - true.
>
> The Bible says two things happened: the canopy burst AND waters of the
> deep gushed from beneath.
>
> Atmospheric conditions such as these, and the total evasion by
> Darwinists, account for the absurdity of the Miller-Urey experiment.

What's absurd about it?


> The best evidence of the Flood is the worldwide accounts and their
> common denominators.

What common denominators, aside from lots of water, would those be?


> Darwinian evasions of this database of evidence
> show what liars they are and how they turn a blind eye to evidence.

You'll have to present more evidence than rainbows and myths to convince
me.


> Ray Martinez

.