Re: Scientific Proof of the Great Flood

On Fri, 02 Sep 2005, "Ray Martinez" <pyramidial@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> Augray wrote:
>> On 1 Sep 2005 12:26:41 -0700, "Ray Martinez" <pyramidial@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote in news:<1125602801.791633.83970@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>> > I know all about a hose and prisms.
>> >
>> > Genesis is saying that the natural phenomenon was created by God as a
>> > sign that He would not destroy by flood ever again.
>>
>> Vertebrate eyes require the same physical laws to function as those that
>> result in the rainbow. If the laws of physics were different in
>> antediluvian times, were eyes different as well?
>>
>>
>> > Nobody can prove that it did not rain prior to 3145 BC.
>> >
>> > Rainbow = proof of Great Flood = deny = not loyal to evidence.
>
> Your post assumes uniformitarian nonsense that the present is the key
> to the past.

It assumes no such thing. He just wants to know whether refraction is
a post-flood phenomenon, and if so, how eye lenses worked before then.


> The Old world was very different.
>
> If you were standing on a bridge looking down at the water beneath,
> prior to 3145 BC if you looked up you would see the same thing - a
> water canopy.
>
> This canopy emitted a continual mist that watered the ground and
> prevented the harmful rays of the sun from getting through. This is one
> fact which explains the length of life back then.
>
> Many persons have pointed out that it could never rain hard enough over
> 40 days to flood the earth - true.
>
> The Bible says two things happened: the canopy burst AND waters of the
> deep gushed from beneath.

So... how much water gushed up from beneath, and where is it now?


> Atmospheric conditions such as these, and the total evasion by
> Darwinists, account for the absurdity of the Miller-Urey experiment.
>
> The best evidence of the Flood is the worldwide accounts and their
> common denominators.

What about the points where the accounts differ?

Keep the evidence you like, throw out the rest?


> Darwinian evasions of this database of evidence show what liars they
> are and how they turn a blind eye to evidence.

You should actually be blaming geologists. They had already
recognized that no such flood ever happened by 1820.


--
Bobby Bryant
Austin, Texas

.