Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: "Deadrat" <ephemera1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 21:55:51 GMT
<nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1125488520.961836.31970@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> It sure is a very strange way to say something does not imply a moral
> imperative, by saying it is value-laden.
*You're* saying it is value-laden. And you're the only one.
> But that is just utter nonsense of course.
As is most of your discourse.
> As before, there is no other rational explanation
> to the word value-laden, your previous explanation of it referring to
> circuity was false, as shown.
>
> You are the best human being?
>
> It implies a moral claim yes, especially since it's a result of a
> mistakenly goalbased process.
Best says nothing about my characters, only about my survival
to reproduce.
> The struggle / competition then becomes
> conceived as the act of will that drives natural selection towards the
> goal of optimal fitness, the mistakenly goalbased theory.
Only in your tiny mind. The struggle is a metaphoric one. There
is no conscious "will" behind it.
> Why are you
> the best human being? Because of your goodness.
No, because I have been able to survive to have children.
> What is your goodness?
> Your perfected heritable qualities that facillitate reproduction,
> preserved by natural selection, the struggle for higher, and higher.
There is explicitly no "higher." There is only the survival to reproduce.
>
> In any case Ariew and Matthen are still saying it is "entirely
> inappropiate". Why it seems you are saying there's nothing much
> inappropiate about it?
Ariew says you misunderstood him. Stop relying on Ariew. He
doesn't back you up.
>
> When so ever are you going to blame Darwinist scientists for
> conceptualizing natural selection wrong for 150+ years, in stead of
> just blaming people who interpreted natural selection according to
> reasonable human understanding ?
This sentence; no meaning.
>
> regards,
> Mohammad Nor Syamsu
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- Prev by Date: Re: An interesting area where the Bible may provide accurate historical insight
- Next by Date: Re: An interesting area where the Bible may provide accurate historicalinsight
- Previous by thread: Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- Next by thread: Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|