Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: "nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx" <nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Aug 2005 04:42:01 -0700
It sure is a very strange way to say something does not imply a moral
imperative, by saying it is value-laden. But that is just utter
nonsense of course. As before, there is no other rational explanation
to the word value-laden, your previous explanation of it referring to
circuity was false, as shown.
You are the best human being?
It implies a moral claim yes, especially since it's a result of a
mistakenly goalbased process. The struggle / competition then becomes
conceived as the act of will that drives natural selection towards the
goal of optimal fitness, the mistakenly goalbased theory. Why are you
the best human being? Because of your goodness. What is your goodness?
Your perfected heritable qualities that facillitate reproduction,
preserved by natural selection, the struggle for higher, and higher.
In any case Ariew and Matthen are still saying it is "entirely
inappropiate". Why it seems you are saying there's nothing much
inappropiate about it?
When so ever are you going to blame Darwinist scientists for
conceptualizing natural selection wrong for 150+ years, in stead of
just blaming people who interpreted natural selection according to
reasonable human understanding ?
regards,
Mohammad Nor Syamsu
.
- References:
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: Deadrat
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: Deadrat
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: AC
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: Deadrat
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: Deadrat
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: Deadrat
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: shane
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: shane
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: John Wilkins
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- Prev by Date: Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?
- Next by Date: Re: Why 64 codons?
- Previous by thread: Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- Next by thread: Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|