Re: It all comes full-circle ... WMDs found in Iraq


"Pavil Natanovich" <pasha582@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1124664684.090650.326740@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>The whole bit on the Iraqi nuclear program looks pretty fraudulent to
> >>me.
>
> >depends. there's the old cliche 'fool me once, shame on you. fool me
> >twice, shame on me'.
>
> >hussein DID have a nuclear program, based on calutrons. there's
> >hardly a point in waiting for him to start again.
>
> The correct quote is, "fool me once, shame on... shame on you. Fool me
> twice... You can't get fooled again."
>
> http://www.strike-the-root.com/3/mrhain/mrhain3.html
>
> The Downing Street memos do a good job of addressing the outright fraud
> upon which our war plans were founded.
>
> http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/iraq/facility/tarmiya.htm
>
> You all blur history into one big justification for any action you wish
> to take, so that your ends justify your means. Saddam was naughty in
> 1990. Although a UN coalition, largely funded by the Saudi royal
> family, kicked his ass in 1991 (and Osam bin Laden also offered the
> Saudis support), 2003 rolls around and we suddenly decide what? Saddam
> got off too lightly?
>
> Why are you using 1990 calutrons to justify action in 2003? Because
> you got squat else, that's why. Bu***. Boo-***. He just scared you
> into striking first and asking questions later.
>
Bull***. I took everything I could think of and that the Bush Adminstration could
think of and came up with my own conclusions. You just want to portray certain
people as naive buffoons, when in reality the buffoon is in your mirror.















.

Loading