Re: ChezWat?!: Evolution of the eye
- From: John Wilkins <j.wilkins1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 11:49:19 +1000
Glenn wrote:
> Eyeballs frozen in time?:
>
> "Of course all the intermediate forms of the eye from the simplest to the
> most advanced exist."
>
Nope. Convergent evolution. Similar forms are dictated by the physics of light
and the chemistry and ontogeny of cells.
As it happens, any form that would be intermediate between a light spot and a
fully formed mobile eyeball exists somewhere *now*. And they are all useful
eyes to those organisms.
--
John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Biohumanities Project
University of Queensland - Blog: evolvethought.blogspot.com
"Darwin's theory has no more to do with philosophy than any other
hypothesis in natural science." Tractatus 4.1122
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ChezWat?!: Evolution of the eye
- From: Glenn
- Re: ChezWat?!: Evolution of the eye
- References:
- Evolution of the eye
- From: Logos
- Re: Evolution of the eye
- From: TomS
- Re: Evolution of the eye
- From: Phil.
- ChezWat?!: Evolution of the eye
- From: Glenn
- Evolution of the eye
- Prev by Date: Re: It all comes full-circle ... WMDs found in Iraq
- Next by Date: Re: Origin of species
- Previous by thread: Re: ChezWat?!: Evolution of the eye
- Next by thread: Re: ChezWat?!: Evolution of the eye
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|