Re: Here's a possibility, but its a tall order; Harshman "got science,"hecandoit
- From: "Glenn" <glennsheldon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:16:50 -0700
"John Harshman" <jharshman.diespamdie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eTrNe.2604$AT7.107@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Glenn wrote:
>
> > "John Harshman" <jharshman.diespamdie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:YIkNe.102$Ux3.92@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> [snip most of the nonsense to get to what might be the nub, if nub there is]
>
> >
> >>Again you seem to be saddled with the idea that reasoning or
> >>inference must be uncertain, arbitrary, or false.
> >
> > And I've probably told you half a dozen times that is not true.
>
> And yet you act as if it is true, as again directly below:
>
> >>This is not the case.
> >>Inferences can be true or false. If you infer that there is no gravity,
> >>you are wrong. If you infer that there is gravity, you are right. In
> >>neither case is gravity affected. Gravity kindly provides strong
> >>evidence for its existence.
> >
There is a small difference in "can be" and "must", John. When you grow up and
realize that you can't get away with these dishonest characterizations, let me
know.
[snip rest of John's nonsense]
.
- References:
- Question for Creationists- What would convince you?
- From: MagentaStudios
- Re: Here's a possibility, but its a tall order; Harshman "got science," he can do it
- From: T Pagano
- Re: Here's a possibility, but its a tall order; Harshman "got science,"he can do it
- From: John Harshman
- Re: Here's a possibility, but its a tall order; Harshman "got science,"he can do it
- From: Glenn
- Re: Here's a possibility, but its a tall order; Harshman "got science,"he can do it
- From: Richard Forrest
- Re: Here's a possibility, but its a tall order; Harshman "got science,"he can do it
- From: Glenn
- Re: Here's a possibility, but its a tall order; Harshman "got science,"he can do it
- From: Richard Forrest
- Re: Here's a possibility, but its a tall order; Harshman "got science,"he can do it
- From: MitchAlsup
- Re: Here's a possibility, but its a tall order; Harshman "got science,"hecan do it
- From: John Harshman
- Re: Here's a possibility, but its a tall order; Harshman "got science,"hecan do it
- From: Glenn
- Re: Here's a possibility, but its a tall order; Harshman "got science,"hecando it
- From: John Harshman
- Re: Here's a possibility, but its a tall order; Harshman "got science,"hecando it
- From: Glenn
- Re: Here's a possibility, but its a tall order; Harshman "got science,"hecandoit
- From: John Harshman
- Re: Here's a possibility, but its a tall order; Harshman "got science,"hecandoit
- From: Glenn
- Re: Here's a possibility, but its a tall order; Harshman "got science,"hecandoit
- From: John Harshman
- Re: Here's a possibility, but its a tall order; Harshman "got science,"hecandoit
- From: Glenn
- Re: Here's a possibility, but its a tall order; Harshman "got science,"hecandoit
- From: John Harshman
- Re: Here's a possibility, but its a tall order; Harshman "got science,"hecandoit
- From: Glenn
- Re: Here's a possibility, but its a tall order; Harshman "got science,"hecandoit
- From: John Harshman
- Question for Creationists- What would convince you?
- Prev by Date: Re: Smoking
- Next by Date: Re: No global flood = God's broken promise?
- Previous by thread: Re: Here's a possibility, but its a tall order; Harshman "got science,"hecandoit
- Next by thread: Re: Here's a possibility, but its a tall order; Harshman "got science,"hecandoit
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|