Re: Attn: Atheists & Skeptics - What's wrong with answersingenesis.com?
- From: Ernest Major <{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 21:58:40 +0100
In message <1124311027.139399.79160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jim
Spaza <spaza9@xxxxxxxxx> writes
>> Really? Can you tell us one of these "easily definable boundaries"?
>> Be specific.
>
>Canines are deferentiable from birds. Fish are differentiable from
>whales. Humans are differentiable from chimps. I guess that I am
>talking about boundaries near the "family" or "order" level.
>
Two of your examples compare clades from different parts of the tree,
and therefore have no relevance to the question of the existence of
easily definable boundaries; the third is at the genus level, and even
this rank is disputed.
--
alias Ernest Major
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.10/73 - Release Date: 15/08/2005
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Question for Creationists- What would convince you?
- Next by Date: Re: WOMEN IN SCIENCE - LETTER TO THE ACLU
- Previous by thread: Re: Attn: Atheists & Skeptics - What's wrong with answersingenesis.com?
- Next by thread: Re: Attn: Atheists & Skeptics - What's wrong with answersingenesis.com?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
