Re: Epigenome and Lamarckian Evolution
- From: "*Hemidactylus*" <ecphoric@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 16 Aug 2005 17:46:15 -0700
John Harshman wrote:
> MagentaStudios wrote:
>
> > I am not a scientist, so be patient with me:
> >
> > I just read an article about the human epigenome, and that it changes
> > our DNA based on our life experiences. Is it possible that this new
> > research could show that Lamarckian evolution is at least partially
> > true?
>
> If indeed the article is correct, that would be Lamarckian evolution,
> depending on what "based on our life experience" means. If this
> epigenome changes DNA so as to produce a specific adaptive response,
> that is one appropriate to the situation rather than a random one, then
> that's Lamarckian.
>
"Changes our DNA" as said above by MagentaStudios, is too vague. If the
change is a methylation pattern of DNA in a somatic cell and no
parallel change exists in a germ line cell that could be passed to
offspring then this is not going to be akin to what people think of
when the term Lamarckian is used. There must be a way for epigenetic
(epigenomic?) change to impact the germline to qualify. Otherwise it's
just another developmental change that stays in the individual affected
and goes no further.
>
> But what article is this, and what does it actually say?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Epigenome and Lamarckian Evolution
- From: John Harshman
- Re: Epigenome and Lamarckian Evolution
- From: MagentaStudios
- Re: Epigenome and Lamarckian Evolution
- References:
- Epigenome and Lamarckian Evolution
- From: MagentaStudios
- Re: Epigenome and Lamarckian Evolution
- From: John Harshman
- Epigenome and Lamarckian Evolution
- Prev by Date: Re: Why ID seems to be so popular amongst the public.
- Next by Date: Re: Mission Statement of a Theistic Evolutionist
- Previous by thread: Re: Epigenome and Lamarckian Evolution
- Next by thread: Re: Epigenome and Lamarckian Evolution
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading