Re: Some evidence I've thought of against evolution
- From: r norman <NotMyRealEmail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 17:24:18 -0400
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:18:49 -0400, "Robert J. Kolker"
<nowhere@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Walter Bushell wrote:
>>
>>
>> You are wrong here. Whales (bats and birds) are in any clade that
>> includes all "fish".
>
>Then there is something very wrong with the kind of classification.
>
>
How many times do you have to be told you are wrong?
If you are puzzled you can ask why you are wrong or just where you
might be misinformed. But don't just keep repeating your error.
Any clade that includes all bony fish also includes bats and whales
and scarlet tanagers and rattlesnakes and poison dart frogs and T rex
and ...
.
- References:
- Some evidence I've thought of against evolution
- From: Logos
- Re: Some evidence I've thought of against evolution
- From: thissteve
- Re: Some evidence I've thought of against evolution
- From: Robert J. Kolker
- Re: Some evidence I've thought of against evolution
- From: Walter Bushell
- Re: Some evidence I've thought of against evolution
- From: Robert J. Kolker
- Some evidence I've thought of against evolution
- Prev by Date: Re: Theres no escaping the subject it would seem...
- Next by Date: Re: Theres no escaping the subject it would seem...
- Previous by thread: Re: Some evidence I've thought of against evolution
- Next by thread: Re: Some evidence I've thought of against evolution
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|