Re: Request for review and approval: Big Bang FAQ
- From: dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 10 Aug 2005 12:50:52 -0700
feuerbac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx schrieb:
>
> [snip]
>
> > I think the lack of response to the BBT article is because
> > it's largely superseded by more advanced thinking, specifically,
> > Golowich's et al "Gravitational scattering of quantum particles".
>
> I got a copy of the paper.
Good
> > Therein they show how to find the "red-shift" is proportional
> > to the density of the universe, and find a basis for the cosmological
> > constant, confirmed by General Relativity and Quantum Theory.
>
> Say, what on earth are you talking about??? The paper does mention
> neither redshift
Yes it does, see Fig.1 and Eq.(24), the photon momentum
equation leading to the "red-shift" does indeed depend
upon gravitating matter in Eq.(38).
Regards
Ken S. Tucker
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Request for review and approval: Big Bang FAQ
- From: feuerbac
- Re: Request for review and approval: Big Bang FAQ
- References:
- Re: Request for review and approval: Big Bang FAQ
- From: feuerbac
- Re: Request for review and approval: Big Bang FAQ
- From: Mark Isaak
- Re: Request for review and approval: Big Bang FAQ
- From: dynamics
- Re: Request for review and approval: Big Bang FAQ
- From: feuerbac
- Re: Request for review and approval: Big Bang FAQ
- Prev by Date: Re: *** Post of the Month for July 2005: Vote Now!
- Next by Date: Re: Poor Darwin
- Previous by thread: Re: Request for review and approval: Big Bang FAQ
- Next by thread: Re: Request for review and approval: Big Bang FAQ
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
