talk.origins

• Date Index

---

• Chimp genome analysis published, Lilith (Deanne Taylor)
• An interesting area where the Bible may provide accurate historical insight, VBM
  • Re: An interesting area where the Bible may provide accurate historical insight, Noone Inparticular
    • Re: An interesting area where the Bible may provide accurate historicalinsight, John Harshman
      • Re: An interesting area where the Bible may provide accurate historicalinsight, Noone Inparticular
    • Re: An interesting area where the Bible may provide accurate historical insight, VBM
  • Re: An interesting area where the Bible may provide accurate historical insight, eswrite
    • Re: An interesting area where the Bible may provide accurate historical insight, Matt Silberstein
  • Re: An interesting area where the Bible may provide accurate historical insight, Matt Silberstein
• equal time for "intelligent healing", TomS
• Prayer Requests, Mark Loy
  • Re: Prayer Requests, RHertz
    • Re: Prayer Requests, noctiluca
• Democracy just doesn't work., eerierodent
• Evolution depressing students, Giant Sloth
  • Re: Evolution depressing students, zawadzki@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Evolution depressing students, mvillanu
  • Re: Evolution depressing students, unrestrained_hand
  • Re: Evolution depressing students, John Harshman
  • Re: Evolution depressing students, Dave
  • Re: Evolution depressing students, Tracy Hamilton
• "Most scientists are probably wrong" - Dembski sees the trees, ignores the forest, noctiluca
  • Re: "Most scientists are probably wrong" - Dembski sees the trees, ignores the forest, dene_bebbo
    • Re: "Most scientists are probably wrong" - Dembski sees the trees, ignores the forest, noctiluca
• Columnist: Dark Ages Primary, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: Columnist: Dark Ages Primary, Murf
• ID cartoon, Xerxes
  • Re: ID cartoon, Rick Merrill
  • Re: ID cartoon, Cyde Weys
  • Re: ID cartoon, Greywolf
• 'Intelligent design' may enter classrooms, Xerxes
• Does Katrina prove the non-existence of God?, dunric@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Does Katrina prove the non-existence of God?, Dale
    • Re: Does Katrina prove the non-existence of God?, Greywolf
  • Re: Does Katrina prove the non-existence of God?, Bobby D. Bryant
    • Re: Does Katrina prove the non-existence of God?, John Wilkins
      • Re: Does Katrina prove the non-existence of God?, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: Does Katrina prove the non-existence of God?, John Wilkins
      • Re: Does Katrina prove the non-existence of God?, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: Does Katrina prove the non-existence of God?, John Wilkins
      • Re: Does Katrina prove the non-existence of God?, Paul J Gans
      • Re: Does Katrina prove the non-existence of God?, AC
  • Re: Does Katrina prove the non-existence of God?, jcon
  • Re: Does Katrina prove the non-existence of God?, Googler
    • Re: Does Katrina prove the non-existence of God?, Bob Pease
      • Re: Does Katrina prove the non-existence of God?, jcon
      • Re: Does Katrina prove the non-existence of God?, TomS
      • Re: Does Katrina prove the non-existence of God?, AC
    • Re: Does Katrina prove the non-existence of God?, AC
      • Re: Does Katrina prove the non-existence of God?, Googler
  • Re: Does Katrina prove the non-existence of God?, AC
• What are we doing here?, Longfellow
  • Re: What are we doing here?, Bobby D. Bryant
  • Re: What are we doing here?, Frank Sullivan
    • Chez Watt! (was Re: What are we doing here?), AC
  • Re: What are we doing here?, Ron O
    • Re: What are we doing here?, John Harshman
  • Re: What are we doing here?, rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx
• September Sci AM, Stuart
• National Review article on design-the "Steve-o-meter", Bob
  • Re: National Review article on design-the "Steve-o-meter", Bob
  • Re: National Review article on design-the "Steve-o-meter", Steve the Sauropodman
  • Re: National Review article on design-the "Steve-o-meter", RHertz
• Katrina: How to help, VoiceOfReason
  • Re: Katrina: How to help, Jeffrey Turner
• Op-Ed: Science's fast pace undercuts allure of intelligent design, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: Op-Ed: Science's fast pace undercuts allure of intelligent design, Rick Merrill
    • Re: Op-Ed: Science's fast pace undercuts allure of intelligent design, AC
  • Re: Op-Ed: Science's fast pace undercuts allure of intelligent design, John Harshman
    • Re: Op-Ed: Science's fast pace undercuts allure of intelligent design, rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Op-Ed: Science's fast pace undercuts allure of intelligent design, John Harshman
      • Re: Op-Ed: Science's fast pace undercuts allure of intelligent design, Bob
      • Re: Op-Ed: Science's fast pace undercuts allure of intelligent design, John Harshman
      • Re: Op-Ed: Science's fast pace undercuts allure of intelligent design, Glenn
      • Re: Op-Ed: Science's fast pace undercuts allure of intelligent design, John Harshman
      • Re: Op-Ed: Science's fast pace undercuts allure of intelligent design, Glenn
      • Re: Op-Ed: Science's fast pace undercuts allure of intelligent design, John Harshman
      • Re: Op-Ed: Science's fast pace undercuts allure of intelligent design, Glenn
      • Re: Op-Ed: Science's fast pace undercuts allure of intelligent design, John Harshman
      • Re: Op-Ed: Science's fast pace undercuts allure of intelligent design, The Last Conformist
      • Re: Op-Ed: Science's fast pace undercuts allure of intelligent design, Craig T
      • Re: Op-Ed: Science's fast pace undercuts allure of intelligent design, Glenn
      • Re: Op-Ed: Science's fast pace undercuts allure of intelligent design, Craig T
      • Re: Op-Ed: Science's fast pace undercuts allure of intelligent design, rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Op-Ed: Science's fast pace undercuts allure of intelligent design, rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Op-Ed: Science's fast pace undercuts allure of intelligent design, Ron O
    • Re: Op-Ed: Science's fast pace undercuts allure of intelligent design, Craig T
      • Re: Op-Ed: Science's fast pace undercuts allure of intelligent design, rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx
• No creationist reaction to FSM?, Andrew Arensburger
  • Re: No creationist reaction to FSM?, Robert Weldon
  • Re: No creationist reaction to FSM?, Rick Merrill
    • Re: No creationist reaction to FSM?, Tracy Hamilton
  • Re: No creationist reaction to FSM?, Werebat
    • Re: No creationist reaction to FSM?, R. Tang
  • Re: No creationist reaction to FSM?, Bobby D. Bryant
    • Re: No creationist reaction to FSM?, barukkhazad
• Attention QMP!, Dana Tweedy
• some questions about ID, Xerxes
  • Re: some questions about ID, Alfred A. Aburto Jr.
• cobweb of life, TomS
• Poisons and radioactivity created by God ?!? - AnswersinGenesis blundered, Kari Tikkanen
  • Re: Poisons and radioactivity created by God ?!? - AnswersinGenesis blundered, Matt Silberstein
    • Re: Poisons and radioactivity created by God ?!? - AnswersinGenesis blundered, jcon
      • Re: Poisons and radioactivity created by God ?!? - AnswersinGenesis blundered, Kari Tikkanen
      • Re: Poisons and radioactivity created by God ?!? - AnswersinGenesis blundered, jcon
      • Re: Poisons and radioactivity created by God ?!? - AnswersinGenesis blundered, jcon
      • Re: Poisons and radioactivity created by God ?!? -AnswersinGenesis blundered, Raymond Griffith
      • Re: Poisons and radioactivity created by God ?!? -AnswersinGenesisblundered, John Wilkins
      • Re: Poisons and radioactivity created by God ?!? -AnswersinGenesis blundered, jcon
    • Re: Poisons and radioactivity created by God ?!? - AnswersinGenesis blundered, Marvin
  • Re: Poisons and radioactivity created by God ?!? - AnswersinGenesis blundered, jcon
    • Re: Poisons and radioactivity created by God ?!? - AnswersinGenesis blundered, ashmoo
• Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
  • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, TomS
    • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, Exponent
      • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, Puppet_Sock
      • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, Alexander
      • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
      • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, Puppet_Sock
      • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
      • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, Exponent
      • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, R. Tang
      • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, Exponent
      • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, R. Tang
      • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, Harlequin
      • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
      • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
      • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, eroot
      • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, Alexander
      • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
      • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
      • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
      • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, Mark VandeWettering
    • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, WCB
    • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, John Wilkins
      • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, catshark
      • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, John Wilkins
      • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
      • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, catshark
  • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, Alexander
  • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, Ferrous Patella
  • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, zawadzki@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
  • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, jcon
    • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
  • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, willreich_77@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
      • Re: Rules for Radicals, and applying them to ID, Werebat
• YEC-ism and the Hubble Deep Field (critique me), Frank Sullivan
  • Re: YEC-ism and the Hubble Deep Field (critique me), mvillanu
  • Re: YEC-ism and the Hubble Deep Field (critique me), Bobby D. Bryant
  • Re: YEC-ism and the Hubble Deep Field (critique me), Robert J. Kolker
  • Re: YEC-ism and the Hubble Deep Field (critique me), TomS
  • Re: YEC-ism and the Hubble Deep Field (critique me), Rick Merrill
    • Re: YEC-ism and the Hubble Deep Field (critique me), Frank Sullivan
      • Re: YEC-ism and the Hubble Deep Field (critique me), Rick Merrill
• Creationist Claim: No evidence that plates are still moving, Harlequin
  • Re: Creationist Claim: No evidence that plates are still moving, Roger Coppock
    • Re: Creationist Claim: No evidence that plates are still moving, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: Creationist Claim: No evidence that plates are still moving, John Wilkins
      • Re: Creationist Claim: No evidence that plates are still moving, AC
      • SV: Creationist Claim: No evidence that plates are still moving, Rolf
      • Re: Creationist Claim: No evidence that plates are still moving, Jim Willemin
      • Re: Creationist Claim: No evidence that plates are still moving, Puppet_Sock
  • Re: Creationist Claim: No evidence that plates are still moving, Roger Coppock
    • Re: Creationist Claim: No evidence that plates are still moving, Snidely F Whiplash
  • Re: Creationist Claim: No evidence that plates are still moving, Stuart
    • Re: Creationist Claim: No evidence that plates are still moving, Bastiaan van de Werk
      • Re: Creationist Claim: No evidence that plates are still moving, Stuart
    • Re: Creationist Claim: No evidence that plates are still moving, TomS
  • Re: Creationist Claim: No evidence that plates are still moving, Sverker Johansson
    • Re: Creationist Claim: No evidence that plates are still moving, Stuart
      • Re: Creationist Claim: No evidence that plates are still moving, Stuart
  • Re: Creationist Claim: No evidence that plates are still moving, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Creationist Claim: No evidence that plates are still moving, Stuart
    • Re: Creationist Claim: No evidence that plates are still moving, josephus
  • Re: Creationist Claim: No evidence that plates are still moving, WCB
  • Re: Creationist Claim: No evidence that plates are still moving, Rick Merrill
    • Re: Creationist Claim: No evidence that plates are still moving, Stuart
      • Re: Creationist Claim: No evidence that plates are still moving, Rick Merrill
• humour: everybody seen this one?, John Vreeland
  • Re: humour: everybody seen this one?, VoiceOfReason
• Right winger to defend science on CSPAN, Bob
  • Re: Right winger to defend science on CSPAN, Bobby D. Bryant
• Op-Ed: Study of design is science, not revelation, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: Op-Ed: Study of design is science, not revelation, Frank J
  • Re: Op-Ed: Study of design is science, not revelation, Daniel T.
  • Re: Op-Ed: Study of design is science, not revelation, Dale
    • Re: Op-Ed: Study of design is science, not revelation, Bobby D. Bryant
    • Re: Op-Ed: Study of design is science, not revelation, Ron O
      • Re: Op-Ed: Study of design is science, not revelation, John Wilkins
    • Re: Op-Ed: Study of design is science, not revelation, Robin Levett
  • Re: Op-Ed: Study of design is science, not revelation, Bobby D. Bryant
• Why 64 codons?, Frank Sullivan
  • Re: Why 64 codons?, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Why 64 codons?, Frank Sullivan
    • Re: Why 64 codons?, Larry Moran
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, Frank Sullivan
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, R.D. Heilman
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, Alfred A. Aburto Jr.
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, R.D. Heilman
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, Rick Merrill
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, R.D. Heilman
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, John Wilkins
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, R.D. Heilman
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, John Wilkins
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, John Wilkins
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, John Wilkins
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, Alfred A. Aburto Jr.
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, Deadrat
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, John Wilkins
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, Larry Moran
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, John Wilkins
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, Larry Moran
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, John Wilkins
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, wade.hines@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, The Last Conformist
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, Matt Silberstein
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, hersheyh
  • Re: Why 64 codons?, Frank Sullivan
    • Re: Why 64 codons?, John Harshman
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, wade.hines@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Why 64 codons?, Jim Willemin
  • Re: Why 64 codons?, John Harshman
    • Re: Why 64 codons?, Frank J
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, John Harshman
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, r norman
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, Bob Pease
      • Re: Why 64 codons?, Robert J. Kolker
  • Re: Why 64 codons?, Frank J
  • Re: Why 64 codons?, Bob Berger
    • Re: Why 64 codons?, Grasshopper
  • Re: Why 64 codons?, Cyde Weys
• Florida: Darwin and evolving standards, Jason Spaceman
• Define creationism, russell.glasser@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Define creationism, John Harshman
    • Re: Define creationism, louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Define creationism, David Jensen
    • Re: Define creationism, Rick Merrill
  • Re: Define creationism, Steven J.
  • Re: Define creationism, Stuart
    • Re: Define creationism, AC
  • Re: Define creationism, Raymond Griffith
    • Re: Define creationism, Exponent
  • Re: Define creationism, Ray Martinez
    • Re: Define creationism, Bobby D. Bryant
    • Re: Define creationism, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Define creationism, Dogma Discharge
      • Re: Define creationism, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Define creationism, Andrew Arensburger
      • Re: Define creationism, John Bode
    • Re: Define creationism, shane
    • Re: Define creationism, Augray
      • Re: Define creationism, Ray Martinez
      • Re: Define creationism, louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Define creationism, Robert Weldon
  • Re: Define creationism, Bobby D. Bryant
  • Re: Define creationism, nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Define creationism, Steven J.
      • Re: Define creationism, nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Define creationism, Matt Silberstein
      • Re: Define creationism, nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Define creationism, russell.glasser@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Define creationism, John Bode
• Re: Time for your weekly dose of creationism lack of evidence strawpoll, Dana Tweedy
  • Re: Time for your weekly dose of creationism lack of evidence strawpoll, andrevan808
    • Re: Time for your weekly dose of creationism lack of evidence strawpoll, shane
    • Re: Time for your weekly dose of creationism lack of evidence strawpoll, Richard Forrest
      • Re: Time for your weekly dose of creationism lack of evidence strawpoll, TomS
      • Re: Time for your weekly dose of creationism lack of evidence strawpoll, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Time for your weekly dose of creationism lack of evidence strawpoll, Richard Forrest
      • Re: Time for your weekly dose of creationism lack of evidence strawpoll, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Time for your weekly dose of creationism lack of evidence strawpoll, Richard Forrest
    • Re: Time for your weekly dose of creationism lack of evidence strawpoll, Dana Tweedy
      • Re: Time for your weekly dose of creationism lack of evidence strawpoll, TomS
• Redhead Cancer Risk, Or Why Is Evolution Such A Difficult Concept?, Dale
  • Re: Redhead Cancer Risk, Or Why Is Evolution Such A Difficult Concept?, Scott Belyea
    • Re: Redhead Cancer Risk, Or Why Is Evolution Such A Difficult Concept?, Walter Bushell
    • Re: Redhead Cancer Risk, Or Why Is Evolution Such A Difficult Concept?, Dale
  • Re: Redhead Cancer Risk, Or Why Is Evolution Such A Difficult Concept?, Ferrous Patella
• Stay healthy! Drink more Coffee!, VoiceOfReason
  • Re: Stay healthy! Drink more Coffee!, Dale
  • Re: Stay healthy! Drink more Coffee!, Rick Merrill
    • Re: Stay healthy! Drink more Coffee!, Walter Bushell
  • Re: Stay healthy! Drink more Coffee!, Mark Isaak
    • Re: Stay healthy! Drink more Coffee!, bussen@xxxxxxxxxx
• "colloquy" scheduled by "Chronicle of Higher Education", TomS
  • Re: "colloquy" scheduled by "Chronicle of Higher Education", Ron O
• [OT] CNN bragging about "FTP technology", Cyde Weys
  • Re: [OT] CNN bragging about "FTP technology", r norman
    • Re: [OT] CNN bragging about "FTP technology", Longfellow
      • Re: [OT] CNN bragging about "FTP technology", r norman
      • Re: [OT] CNN bragging about "FTP technology", Longfellow
      • Re: [OT] CNN bragging about "FTP technology", josephus
      • Re: [OT] CNN bragging about "FTP technology", Longfellow
      • Re: [OT] CNN bragging about "FTP technology", Andrew Arensburger
      • Re: [OT] CNN bragging about "FTP technology", Longfellow
      • Re: [OT] CNN bragging about "FTP technology", Andrew Arensburger
      • Re: [OT] CNN bragging about "FTP technology", Longfellow
      • Re: CNN bragging about "FTP technology", wade.hines@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: CNN bragging about "FTP technology", Longfellow
      • Re: [OT] CNN bragging about "FTP technology", John McKendry
      • Re: [OT] CNN bragging about "FTP technology", Longfellow
    • Re: [OT] CNN bragging about "FTP technology", Dale
      • Re: [OT] CNN bragging about "FTP technology", Andrew Arensburger
      • Re: [OT] CNN bragging about "FTP technology", AC
  • Re: [OT] CNN bragging about "FTP technology", Andrew Arensburger
    • Re: CNN bragging about "FTP technology", Cyde Weys
      • Re: CNN bragging about "FTP technology", Puppet_Sock
      • Re: CNN bragging about "FTP technology", Martin
      • Re: CNN bragging about "FTP technology", Andrew Arensburger
• The Case for Shakespeare, TomS
  • Re: The Case for Shakespeare, Bobby D. Bryant
    • Re: The Case for Shakespeare, AC
    • Re: The Case for Shakespeare, Bob Pease
  • Re: The Case for Shakespeare, Rick Merrill
    • Re: The Case for Shakespeare, TomS
      • Re: The Case for Shakespeare, Rick Merrill
      • Re: The Case for Shakespeare, TomS
  • Re: The Case for Shakespeare, Roger Coppock
• Speciation question, C.L.
  • Re: Speciation question, andrevan808
    • Re: Speciation question, shane
    • Re: Speciation question, Bobby D. Bryant
    • Re: Speciation question, Dan Luke
    • Re: Speciation question, David Jensen
    • Re: Speciation question, David Jensen
    • Re: Speciation question, Richard Forrest
    • Re: Speciation question, Dana Tweedy
    • Re: Speciation question, Bob
      • Re: Speciation question, Rick Merrill
      • Re: Speciation question, r norman
      • Re: Speciation question, Rick Merrill
      • Re: Speciation question, John Harshman
  • Re: Speciation question, Bobby D. Bryant
  • Re: Speciation question, r norman
  • Re: Speciation question, r norman
  • Re: Speciation question, John Harshman
  • Re: Speciation question, C.L.
    • Re: Speciation question, John Harshman
      • Re: Speciation question, r norman
      • Re: Speciation question, C.L.
      • Re: Speciation question, John Harshman
      • Re: Speciation question, r norman
    • Re: Speciation question, Bobby D. Bryant
    • Re: Speciation question, Daniel T.
  • Re: Speciation question, Daniel T.
    • Re: Speciation question, John Wilkins
  • Re: Speciation question, Stanley Friesen
• Beware the IDes march on, Al
  • Re: Beware the IDes march on, Bobby D. Bryant
    • Re: Beware the IDes march on, Bob Pease
    • Re: Beware the IDes march on, Bob
  • Re: Beware the IDes march on, The Last Conformist
  • Re: Beware the IDes march on, Wakboth
    • Re: Beware the IDes march on, Bob Pease
  • Re: Beware the IDes march on, Augray
  • Re: Beware the IDes march on, AC
  • Re: Beware the IDes march on, Stuart
• Commentary: Evolution battle roils scholars, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: Commentary: Evolution battle roils scholars, Bob Pease
• Columnist: Just Check the ID, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: Columnist: Just Check the ID, Ron O
    • Re: Columnist: Just Check the ID, David Jensen
    • Re: Columnist: Just Check the ID, David Jensen
  • Re: Columnist: Just Check the ID, Andrew Arensburger
• "acquired" characteristics, C.L.
  • Re: "acquired" characteristics, Robert J. Kolker
  • Re: "acquired" characteristics, John Harshman
  • Re: "acquired" characteristics, DougC
  • Re: "acquired" characteristics, Matt Silberstein
  • Re: "acquired" characteristics, Bob Pease
  • Re: "acquired" characteristics, J. J. Lodder
  • Re: "acquired" characteristics, Robert J. Kolker
  • Re: "acquired" characteristics, WCB
    • Re: "acquired" characteristics, Rick Merrill
  • Re: "acquired" characteristics, Thore \"Tocis\" Schmechtig
  • Re: "acquired" characteristics, David Jensen
    • Re: "acquired" characteristics, J. J. Lodder
• weighing in in Seattle paper, Josh Hayes
  • Re: weighing in in Seattle paper, Cubist
  • Re: weighing in in Seattle paper, Daniel T.
• Reservoirs of Evolution, Longfellow
• Re: Evolution Is Religion, Not Science, Longfellow
• [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Cyde Weys
  • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Dan Luke
    • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Cyde Weys
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, David Jensen
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Nancy Norton
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Bobby D. Bryant
    • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Paul J Gans
      • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, *Hemidactylus*
      • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Dan Luke
    • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Walter Bushell
  • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, RHertz
    • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Cyde Weys
  • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Harlequin
    • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Steve Schaffner
  • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, George Cleveland
  • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Frank Sullivan
  • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Bobby D. Bryant
    • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Jim Lovejoy
    • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Walter Bushell
      • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Robert Grumbine
      • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Paul J Gans
      • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Robert Grumbine
      • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Walter Bushell
      • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Robert Grumbine
  • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, *Hemidactylus*
    • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Craig T
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Robert J. Kolker
    • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Dan Luke
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Dan Luke
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Dan Luke
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Dan Luke
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, VoiceOfReason
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Dan Luke
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Dan Luke
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, AC
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, VoiceOfReason
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Dan Luke
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Paul J Gans
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, John Wilkins
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Paul J Gans
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, John Wilkins
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Paul J Gans
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Dan Luke
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Paul J Gans
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Dan Luke
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, David Jensen
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, TomS
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Dan Luke
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Nancy Norton
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Josh Hayes
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, *Hemidactylus*
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Josh Hayes
  • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Robert J. Kolker
    • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Mark Isaak
  • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, dkomo
    • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Walter Bushell
    • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Walter Bushell
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Robert Grumbine
      • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Paul J Gans
      • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Mark Isaak
      • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Paul J Gans
    • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Richard Smol
  • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, VoiceOfReason
    • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Dan Luke
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Walter Bushell
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, VoiceOfReason
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Walter Bushell
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, jemccloskey
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Matt Silberstein
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, David Jensen
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Walter Bushell
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Walter Bushell
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Josh Hayes
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Paul J Gans
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Earle Jones
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Robert Grumbine
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Paul J Gans
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Robert Grumbine
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, David Jensen
    • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Walter Bushell
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Josh Hayes
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Robert Grumbine
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Matt Silberstein
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Robert Grumbine
      • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Paul J Gans
  • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Richard Smol
    • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Rodjk #613
  • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Andrew Arensburger
    • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Dan Luke
      • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Walter Bushell
    • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Walter Bushell
    • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Bobby D. Bryant
  • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Bobby D. Bryant
    • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Walter Bushell
      • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Ken Aaker
      • Re: [OT] My Hurricane Katrina Predictions, Paul J Gans
  • Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, dkomo
    • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, Noone Inparticular
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, David Jensen
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, Noone Inparticular
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, AC
    • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, *Hemidactylus*
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, Dan Luke
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, Friar Broccoli
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, dkomo
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, Paul J Gans
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, *Hemidactylus*
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, Dan Luke
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, Robert Grumbine
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, dkomo
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, Matt Silberstein
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, Josh Hayes
    • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, AC
    • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, VoiceOfReason
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, AC
      • Re: Katrina Results, VoiceOfReason
      • Re: Katrina Results, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, dkomo
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, TomS
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, Dick C
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, Josh Hayes
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, Noone Inparticular
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, Dick C
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, Dick C
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, VoiceOfReason
    • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, Matt Silberstein
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, Matt Silberstein
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, dkomo
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, VoiceOfReason
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, Dan Luke
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, Michael Ikeda
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, B Richardson
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, Dick C
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, VoiceOfReason
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, AC
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, David Jensen
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, Nancy Norton
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, Bobby D. Bryant
    • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, Mike Painter
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, John Wilkins
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Katrina jogs east -- The Big Easy lives to party on, John Wilkins
  • Katrina's present for Labor Day, dkomo
• Penguin Evolution, catshark
  • Re: Penguin Evolution, Greg G.
    • Re: Penguin Evolution, Craig T
• Commentary: Should intelligent design be taught in science class?, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: Commentary: Should intelligent design be taught in science class?, Robert J. Kolker
  • Re: Commentary: Should intelligent design be taught in science class?, Alfred A. Aburto Jr.
    • Re: Commentary: Should intelligent design be taught in science class?, Greywolf
  • Re: Commentary: Should intelligent design be taught in science class?, Dave
• Unaugmentably complex, tchow
  • Re: Unaugmentably complex, Alexander
  • Re: Unaugmentably complex, eNo
  • Re: Unaugmentably complex, Rick Merrill
    • Re: Unaugmentably complex, r norman
      • Re: Unaugmentably complex, Puppet_Sock
      • Re: Unaugmentably complex, r norman
      • Re: Unaugmentably complex, WCB
  • Re: Unaugmentably complex, TomS
• Brian Appleyard in The Sunday Times, Andrew Shepherd
  • Re: Brian Appleyard in The Sunday Times, Alexander
    • Re: Brian Appleyard in The Sunday Times, Douglas Clark
      • Re: Brian Appleyard in The Sunday Times, Bob Pease
• "WE ARE TAKING THE DINOSAURS BACK!" declare Creationists, rms
  • Re: "WE ARE TAKING THE DINOSAURS BACK!" declare Creationists, The Last Conformist
    • Re: "WE ARE TAKING THE DINOSAURS BACK!" declare Creationists, Dave Oldridge
      • Re: "WE ARE TAKING THE DINOSAURS BACK!" declare Creationists, Mesodino65
      • Re: "WE ARE TAKING THE DINOSAURS BACK!" declare Creationists, The Last Conformist
      • Re: "WE ARE TAKING THE DINOSAURS BACK!" declare Creationists, Augray
      • Re: "WE ARE TAKING THE DINOSAURS BACK!" declare Creationists, The Last Conformist
      • Re: "WE ARE TAKING THE DINOSAURS BACK!" declare Creationists, John Wilkins
      • Re: "WE ARE TAKING THE DINOSAURS BACK!" declare Creationists, Dana Tweedy
      • Re: "WE ARE TAKING THE DINOSAURS BACK!" declare Creationists, louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: "WE ARE TAKING THE DINOSAURS BACK!" declare Creationists, Walter Bushell
    • Re: "WE ARE TAKING THE DINOSAURS BACK!" declare Creationists, Walter Bushell
  • Re: "WE ARE TAKING THE DINOSAURS BACK!" declare Creationists, Walter Bushell
    • Re: "WE ARE TAKING THE DINOSAURS BACK!" declare Creationists, rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: "WE ARE TAKING THE DINOSAURS BACK!" declare Creationists, TeaWrecks
• Evolution stops. Devolution begins at a startling pace. Increase of bodily hair noted with alarm., muldoon
  • Re: Evolution stops. Devolution begins at a startling pace. Increase of bodily hair noted with alarm., Frank J
    • Re: Evolution stops. Devolution begins at a startling pace. Increase of bodily hair noted with alarm., The Dark -- Enlightened
  • Re: Evolution stops. Devolution begins at a startling pace. Increaseof bodily hair noted with alarm., Robert J. Kolker
  • Re: Evolution stops. Devolution begins at a startling pace. Increase of bodily hair noted with alarm., Bobby D. Bryant
  • Re: Evolution stops. Devolution begins at a startling pace. Increase of bodily hair noted with alarm., Walter Bushell
  • Re: Evolution stops. Devolution begins at a startling pace. Increase of bodily hair noted with alarm., TomS
• Article: It's all relative innit?, Alexander
  • Re: Article: It's all relative innit?, Ian H Spedding
  • Re: Article: It's all relative innit?, Frank J
  • Re: Article: It's all relative innit?, Bobby D. Bryant
• Re: Daniel Clement Dennett, Frank J
• Commentary: Science Fiction, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: Commentary: Science Fiction, rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Commentary: Science Fiction, Frank J
      • Re: Commentary: Science Fiction, Bobby D. Bryant
  • Re: Commentary: Science Fiction, Frank J
    • Re: Commentary: Science Fiction, rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx
• the evolutionary tree, Zoe
  • Re: the evolutionary tree, VoiceOfReason
    • Re: the evolutionary tree, Deadrat
      • Re: the evolutionary tree, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: the evolutionary tree, Deadrat
      • Re: the evolutionary tree, John Harshman
      • Re: the evolutionary tree, Deadrat
  • Re: the evolutionary tree, Frank Sullivan
    • Re: the evolutionary tree, Robert J. Kolker
  • Re: the evolutionary tree, Neil W Rickert
  • Re: the evolutionary tree, Thore \"Tocis\" Schmechtig
    • Re: the evolutionary tree, unrestrained_hand
  • Re: the evolutionary tree, Steven J.
  • Re: the evolutionary tree, Robert J. Kolker
  • Re: the evolutionary tree, Robert J. Kolker
  • Re: the evolutionary tree, Mark VandeWettering
  • Re: the evolutionary tree, Mitchell Coffey
  • Re: the evolutionary tree, Bobby D. Bryant
  • Re: the evolutionary tree, John Drayton
    • Re: the evolutionary tree, *Hemidactylus*
  • Re: the evolutionary tree, John Harshman
  • Re: the evolutionary tree, Matt Silberstein
    • Re: the evolutionary tree, John Harshman
      • Re: the evolutionary tree, Matt Silberstein
      • Re: the evolutionary tree, John Harshman
      • Re: the evolutionary tree, Matt Silberstein
      • Re: the evolutionary tree, John Harshman
      • Re: the evolutionary tree, Matt Silberstein
      • Re: the evolutionary tree, John Harshman
      • Re: the evolutionary tree, Matt Silberstein
  • Re: the evolutionary tree, John Bode
• IC redux, Natt Serrasalmus
  • Re: IC redux, Dr.GH
  • Re: IC redux, Thore \"Tocis\" Schmechtig
  • Re: IC redux, Robert J. Kolker
    • Re: IC redux, rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: IC redux, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: IC redux, rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: IC redux, Cubist
    • Re: IC redux, Robert J. Kolker
  • Re: IC redux, Bobby D. Bryant
  • Re: IC redux, Ernest Major
  • Re: IC redux, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
    • Re: IC redux, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: IC redux, David Jensen
      • Re: IC redux, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: IC redux, David Jensen
      • Re: IC redux, rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: IC redux, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: IC redux, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: IC redux, Walter Bushell
  • Re: IC redux, The Last Conformist
    • Re: IC redux, TomS
      • Re: IC redux, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: IC redux, rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: IC redux, TomS
    • Re: IC redux, Victor Eijkhout
      • Re: IC redux, The Last Conformist
  • Re: IC redux, wade.hines@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: IC redux, rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx
• Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Benton
  • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, andrevan808
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, David Jensen
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, TomS
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Dana Tweedy
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, andrevan808
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, andrevan808
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, andrevan808
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Steve Schaffner
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, AC
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Rick Merrill
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Dana Tweedy
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Rick Merrill
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Rick Merrill
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, unrestrained_hand
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Dana Tweedy
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, AC
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, andrevan808
    • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Zachriel
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Robert J. Kolker
    • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Richard Forrest
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Walter Bushell
    • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Dana Tweedy
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Benton
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, John Harshman
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, John Harshman
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, John Harshman
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Steve Schaffner
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, John Harshman
  • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, John Harshman
    • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Benton
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, John Harshman
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Benton
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, John Harshman
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Benton
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, John Harshman
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Benton
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, John Harshman
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Noone Inparticular
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Benton
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Noone Inparticular
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, John Harshman
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Benton
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Noone Inparticular
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, John Harshman
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Benton
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, John Harshman
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Benton
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, John Harshman
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Benton
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Noone Inparticular
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Benton
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Noone Inparticular
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Benton
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Benton
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, John Harshman
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Benton
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, John Harshman
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Benton
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, John Harshman
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, John Harshman
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Benton
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, John Harshman
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Steven J.
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Benton
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Zachriel
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Zachriel
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Benton
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Steve Schaffner
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Benton
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, John Harshman
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Steve Schaffner
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Benton
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Zachriel
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Ernest Major
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Mark VandeWettering
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Zachriel
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Earle Jones
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Steve Schaffner
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Earle Jones
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Zachriel
  • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Dave
    • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Benton
      • Re: Alternative Mechanisms of Evolution?, Dave
• My country, Earle Jones
  • Re: My country, shane
  • Re: My country, VoiceOfReason
  • Re: My country, unrestrained_hand
    • Re: My country, shane
  • Re: My country, DougC
  • Re: My country, SortingItOut
• Re: $10,000 Reward for Disproving Mr. Conrad's Man-made Coalified tool Handle, Dan Luke
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: $10,000 Reward for Disproving Mr. Conrad's Man-made Coalified tool Handle, Dana Tweedy
    • Re: $10,000 Reward for Disproving Mr. Conrad's Man-made Coalified tool Handle, VoiceOfReason
      • Re: $10,000 Reward for Disproving Mr. Conrad's Man-made Coalified tool Handle, Quotidian Quandary
      • Re: $10,000 Reward for Disproving Mr. Conrad's Man-made Coalified tool Handle, Lin Liangtai
      • Re: $10,000 Reward for Disproving Mr. Conrad's Man-made Coalified tool Handle, Richard Forrest
      • Re: $10,000 Reward for Disproving Mr. Conrad's Man-made Coalified tool Handle, VoiceOfReason
  • Re: $10,000 Reward for Disproving Mr. Conrad's Man-made Coalified tool Handle, Dick C
    • Re: $10,000 Reward for Disproving Mr. Conrad's Man-made Coalified tool Handle, Lin Liangtai
      • Re: $10,000 Reward for Disproving Mr. Conrad's Man-made Coalified tool Handle, Dick C
      • Re: $10,000 Reward for Disproving Mr. Conrad's Man-made Coalified tool Handle, Lin Liangtai
  • Re: $10,000 Reward for Disproving Mr. Conrad's Man-made Coalified tool Handle, Augray
    • Re: $10,000 Reward for Disproving Mr. Conrad's Man-made Coalified tool Handle, Lin Liangtai
      • Re: $10,000 Reward for Disproving Mr. Conrad's Man-made Coalified tool Handle, Lin Liangtai
• Literalism the lynchpin of creationism, STAN MULAIK
  • Re: Literalism the lynchpin of creationism, Bob
  • Re: Literalism the lynchpin of creationism, rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Literalism the lynchpin of creationism, C.L.
    • Re: Literalism the lynchpin of creationism, Xerxes
    • Re: Literalism the lynchpin of creationism, rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Literalism the lynchpin of creationism, Daniel T.
• Lawsuit, Stuart
  • Re: Lawsuit, Paul J Gans
    • Re: Lawsuit, Frank Sullivan
      • Re: Lawsuit, Larry Moran
      • Re: Lawsuit, Paul J Gans
      • Re: Lawsuit, maff
      • Re: Lawsuit, Roger Coppock
      • Re: Lawsuit, maff
      • Re: Lawsuit, Noone Inparticular
      • Re: Lawsuit, maff
      • Re: Lawsuit, Noone Inparticular
      • Neural networks, maff
      • Re: Lawsuit, Alfred A. Aburto Jr.
      • Re: Lawsuit, Alexander
      • Re: Lawsuit, pz
      • Re: Lawsuit, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: Lawsuit, Paul J Gans
      • Re: Lawsuit, Dr.GH
      • Re: Lawsuit, Mitchell Coffey
      • Re: Lawsuit, Michael Siemon
      • Re: Lawsuit, Roger Coppock
      • Re: Lawsuit, Roger Coppock
  • Re: Lawsuit, Roger Coppock
• FAQ Suggestion: Flat Earth Society, Andrew Arensburger
  • Re: FAQ Suggestion: Flat Earth Society, Ron O
  • Re: FAQ Suggestion: Flat Earth Society, Roger Coppock
  • Re: FAQ Suggestion: Flat Earth Society, Frank J
    • Re: FAQ Suggestion: Flat Earth Society, Harlequin
  • Re: FAQ Suggestion: Flat Earth Society, J. J. Lodder
• Dembski's blog, Ron O
• Re: What evidence is there that the Temple of Solomon existed?, David Iain Greig
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What evidence is there that the Temple of Solomon existed?, David Iain Greig
  • Re: What evidence is there that the Temple of Solomon existed?, Dana Tweedy
• Bill Dembski goes all postmodern and stuff, Andrew Arensburger
  • Re: Bill Dembski goes all postmodern and stuff, Ron O
• Bill Gates gives millions to the Discovery Institute, human
  • Re: Bill Gates gives millions to the Discovery Institute, Ron O
    • Re: Bill Gates gives millions to the Discovery Institute, horncabbage
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bill Gates gives millions to the Discovery Institute, Ron O
  • Re: Bill Gates gives millions to the Discovery Institute, Googler
    • Re: Bill Gates gives millions to the Discovery Institute, Ron O
      • Re: Bill Gates gives millions to the Discovery Institute, Googler
      • Re: Bill Gates gives millions to the Discovery Institute, Alexander
      • Re: Bill Gates gives millions to the Discovery Institute, Ron O
      • Re: Bill Gates gives millions to the Discovery Institute, VoiceOfReason
    • Re: Bill Gates gives millions to the Discovery Institute, J. J. Lodder
      • Re: Bill Gates gives millions to the Discovery Institute, Googler
    • Re: Bill Gates gives millions to the Discovery Institute, Friar Broccoli
      • Re: Bill Gates gives millions to the Discovery Institute, Googler
  • Re: Bill Gates gives millions to the Discovery Institute, Craig Franck
  • Re: Bill Gates gives millions to the Discovery Institute, Cyde Weys
    • Re: Bill Gates gives millions to the Discovery Institute, Ron O
      • Re: Bill Gates gives millions to the Discovery Institute, Walter Bushell
    • Re: Bill Gates gives millions to the Discovery Institute, Paul J Gans
      • Re: Bill Gates gives millions to the Discovery Institute, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: Bill Gates gives millions to the Discovery Institute, Paul J Gans
      • Re: Bill Gates gives millions to the Discovery Institute, Walter Bushell
• religious discrimination suit against U. California, TomS
  • Re: religious discrimination suit against U. California, Ron O
    • Re: religious discrimination suit against U. California, TomS
      • Re: religious discrimination suit against U. California, Ron O
      • Re: religious discrimination suit against U. California, catshark
      • Re: religious discrimination suit against U. California, Ron O
      • Re: religious discrimination suit against U. California, Frank L
    • Re: religious discrimination suit against U. California, Emma Pease
      • Re: religious discrimination suit against U. California, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: religious discrimination suit against U. California, Bob Berger
      • Re: religious discrimination suit against U. California, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: religious discrimination suit against U. California, Ferrous Patella
      • Re: religious discrimination suit against U. California, Walter Bushell
      • Re: religious discrimination suit against U. California, Emma Pease
  • Re: religious discrimination suit against U. California, Roger Coppock
  • Re: religious discrimination suit against U. California, louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: religious discrimination suit against U. California, Bobby D. Bryant
    • Re: religious discrimination suit against U. California, Harlequin
      • Re: religious discrimination suit against U. California, Ron O
      • Re: religious discrimination suit against U. California, TomS
      • Re: religious discrimination suit against U. California, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• News: Sternberg, we hardly knew ye, Alexander
  • Re: News: Sternberg, we hardly knew ye, Ron O
    • Re: News: Sternberg, we hardly knew ye, Alexander
      • Re: News: Sternberg, we hardly knew ye, VoiceOfReason
      • Re: News: Sternberg, we hardly knew ye, Alexander
      • Re: News: Sternberg, we hardly knew ye, Bobby D. Bryant
  • Re: News: Sternberg, we hardly knew ye, John Harshman
    • Re: News: Sternberg, we hardly knew ye, Ron O
    • Re: News: Sternberg, we hardly knew ye, Sverker Johansson
  • Re: News: Sternberg, we hardly knew ye, Bobby D. Bryant
• News: The usual suspects, Alexander
  • Re: News: The usual suspects, The Last Conformist
    • Re: News: The usual suspects, Frank J
      • Re: News: The usual suspects, Frank J
  • Re: News: The usual suspects, rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: News: The usual suspects, Alexander
• In the News: Dover Area tape issues back, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: In the News: Dover Area tape issues back, Ron O
  • Re: In the News: Dover Area tape issues back, Bobby D. Bryant
• Re: God / Science, Joe Cummings
  • Re: God / Science, Robert J. Kolker
• WingNutDaily columnist: Blind science, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: WingNutDaily columnist: Blind science, Bob
    • Re: WingNutDaily columnist: Blind science, Ron O
      • Re: WingNutDaily columnist: Blind science, Frank J
  • Chez Watt: WingNutDaily columnist: Blind science, Ferrous Patella
• [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Bobby D. Bryant
  • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Josh Hayes
  • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Dan Luke
  • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., AC
    • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Matthew Isleb
    • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Paul J Gans
      • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Jeffrey Turner
      • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Walter Bushell
  • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Rick Merrill
    • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Matthew Isleb
      • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Rick Merrill
  • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Paul J Gans
    • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Katt
    • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Josh Hayes
      • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Paul J Gans
      • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Josh Hayes
      • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Jeffrey Turner
      • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Josh Hayes
      • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., David Jensen
      • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Paul J Gans
      • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Paul J Gans
      • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., shane
      • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Paul J Gans
      • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Larry Moran
      • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Paul J Gans
  • Re: About that Iraqi constitution..., VoiceOfReason
    • Re: About that Iraqi constitution..., Katt
      • Re: About that Iraqi constitution..., VoiceOfReason
      • Re: About that Iraqi constitution..., Earle Jones
      • Re: About that Iraqi constitution..., Larry Moran
    • Re: About that Iraqi constitution..., Dan Luke
      • Re: About that Iraqi constitution..., Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: About that Iraqi constitution..., Dan Luke
      • Re: About that Iraqi constitution..., Larry Moran
      • Re: About that Iraqi constitution..., Michael Siemon
      • Re: About that Iraqi constitution..., Paul J Gans
      • Re: About that Iraqi constitution..., Mitchell Coffey
      • Re: About that Iraqi constitution..., Paul J Gans
      • Re: About that Iraqi constitution..., Matt Silberstein
      • Re: About that Iraqi constitution..., Paul J Gans
      • Re: About that Iraqi constitution..., Bob
      • Re: About that Iraqi constitution..., Robert
      • Re: About that Iraqi constitution..., Josh Hayes
      • Re: About that Iraqi constitution..., Paul J Gans
      • Re: About that Iraqi constitution..., Jeffrey Turner
      • Re: About that Iraqi constitution..., chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: About that Iraqi constitution..., Alexander
    • Re: About that Iraqi constitution..., Earle Jones
    • Re: About that Iraqi constitution..., Mitchell Coffey
  • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Mike Painter
    • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Katt
      • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Paul J Gans
      • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., John Wilkins
      • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Jeffrey Turner
      • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Paul J Gans
      • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., John S. Wilkins
      • Re: [OT] About that Iraqi constitution..., Bobby D. Bryant