Re: Can anyone explain why these blood vessel remains are blue?
- From: John Baker <nunya@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:11:41 -0500
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 07:13:01 -0800 (PST), Lin Liangtai
<lin440315@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2007?12?25?, ??12?09?, "David V." <s...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
LinLiangtaiwrote:
On 12?24?, ??1?36?, "David V." <s...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
LinLiangtaiwrote:
The following links showbloodvesselremainsthat areblueor
red. Some of them seem to have been fossilized. Hasanyone
seen any such- coloredbloodvesselremains? Could they be
stained and mummified before they were fossilized?
Those are not blood vessels.
What are they?
Whatever they are, they are not blood vessels.
--
Dave
You measure a democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents,
not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists.
- Abbie Hoffman
They are remains of blood vessels
No they aren't.
.
- References:
- Re: Can anyone explain why these blood vessel remains are blue?
- From: Lin Liangtai
- Re: Can anyone explain why these blood vessel remains are blue?
- Prev by Date: Re: when did religion start
- Next by Date: We ALL have the same evidence (Atheists and Theists alike)
- Previous by thread: Re: Can anyone explain why these blood vessel remains are blue?
- Next by thread: We ALL have the same evidence (Atheists and Theists alike)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
