Re: The logic of atheism

Now, here's the  key part, the diagonalization. We make  a list of
the diagonals; in  this case, it starts out  with two falses. This
is itself something (a sequence  of true / false statements)

I’m confused about what is actually in this list of diagonals. Do you
mean for it to be “Water is equal to 4 AND 2+2 is wet AND...” or for it
to just be a list of the diagonal entries themselves, as you have
written “false false true true ...” I’m assuming it’s the latter based
on the way you wrote it out, but I just wanted to make sure. Maybe,
for clarity, you would label that entry, “The sequence ‘false false
true true...’”.

about which a  truth can be known  (can be found on  God's cheat ***).

This label I don’t understand. Wouldn’t this yield a “true” in every
column, since by definition they’re all on the cheat ***?

And, it’s not yet clear to me that the diagonal elements of the table
can be found on the cheat *** but the inverted sequence of diagonal
elements couldn’t be; you can find either sequence, it’s just a matter
of how you look.

.

Loading