Re: The logic of atheism
- From: "Paul Holbach" <paulholbachDELETETHENAME@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Apr 2006 14:48:39 -0700
Paul Holbach wrote:
All in all, so the theist may conclude from what's been stated above,
there is a perfectly meaningful and consistent conception of
omniscience, if "to be omniscient" is not interpreted as "to be
all-knowing" but as "to be each-knowing".
"conjunctive omniscience" versus "disjunctive omniscience", so to
speak.
#PH
.
- References:
- Re: The logic of atheism
- From: Paul Holbach
- Re: The logic of atheism
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: The logic of atheism
- From: Paul Holbach
- Re: The logic of atheism
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: The logic of atheism
- From: Paul Holbach
- Re: The logic of atheism
- From: Paul Holbach
- Re: The logic of atheism
- From: Paul Holbach
- Re: The logic of atheism
- From: Paul Holbach
- Re: The logic of atheism
- From: Paul Holbach
- Re: The logic of atheism
- From: Paul Holbach
- Re: The logic of atheism
- From: Paul Holbach
- Re: The logic of atheism
- From: Ben Goren
- Re: The logic of atheism
- From: Paul Holbach
- Re: The logic of atheism
- From: Paul Holbach
- Re: The logic of atheism
- From: Paul Holbach
- Re: The logic of atheism
- Prev by Date: Re: The logic of atheism
- Next by Date: Re: The logic of atheism
- Previous by thread: Re: The logic of atheism
- Next by thread: Re: The logic of atheism
- Index(es):