Re: The logic of atheism


Paul Holbach wrote:

Simply because if there were any sound theistic arguments, we atheists
would be morally obliged to renounce atheism and become theists.

Hypothetically, suppose a theist agrees that he has no evidence that
there is a god but says that his religion is good because the true
followers of his religion don't go around murdering people or having
sex outside of marriage. The theist immediately has the upper hand
because simply having the belief that there isn't a god doesn't imply
one has any moral values.

--
Ron

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Boy dies after being hit by train
    ... oh well, God knows best". ... Then the trouble is blamed on religion, ... Atheists and theists aren't even talking about the same thing. ...
    (uk.railway)
  • Re: Genius of Charles Darwin
    ... even the theists on this newsgroup - AAQ, ... Take any experiment you can think of which purports to test god or ... evidence for my assertion is that empirical evidence, or lack thereof, ... and sometimes science can't make their sick ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Genius of Charles Darwin
    ... they have no evidence. ... Science is not a worldview, ... If the god of religion A is conceived of as natural and testable, ... evidence of god's existence theists, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The logic of atheism
    ... The point is that if the theists are right, ... If there were any, repeat any proof that a god existed, ... Perhaps even worship a god ... religion and it would be their ace in the hole. ...
    (talk.atheism)
  • Re: is evolution a mainstay of atheism?
    ... I cannot be defined in terms of somebody else's religion other than not ... Which is one reason I refuse to be identified according to their god. ... I'm only even aware I'm atheist when theists bring up their gods. ... There have been atheists as long as there have been theists. ...
    (uk.philosophy.atheism)
Quantcast