Re: atheism and astrology?


prabbit1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> cantueso@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> No, I mean logical as in it's


do you mean "its"?

>CORRECT meaning; i.e. that cause follows
> effect

you would mean the opposite of what you say. you mean that the effect
follows the cause

> in an orderly, consistent manner

I think you mean a faculty or a preparation that allows you to
determine whether the "manner" is "consistent" (with what? with your
expectations?)

> that it's capable of applying
> reasoning to the process.

who?


>
> If you're going to keep using your own, private daffynitions

Oh! the daffynitions?

>, then go argue
> with someone else.
>
> >>
> > remember:
>
> > the original question was whether there is a connection between
> > astrology and atheism
>
> And there's not.
>
> > some people thought it necessary to state that the existence of God
> > cannot be proven. since this has been known for at least 200 years,
> > more like 500 years, I only added that God's non-existence cannot be
> > proven either, ......
>
> So? It's not upon us to prove god's non-existence.

???

cannot be proven..

> If you think it is, then
> you prove that I don't possess an IOU showing that you owe me $1,000,000
> becuase I'm taking you to court tomorrow and suing you for payment on that
> IOU.

???
>
> > and that such lack of proof is not itself a proof .......
>
> > all of which does not seem to be related to the original question
>
>
> --
> Mike
>
> -------------------------------
> "Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop
> thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do
> we," George W. "Shrub" Bush Aug 5, 2004

.