Re: An Atheist's Faith
- From: Christopher A. Lee <calee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 09:16:15 -0500
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 00:33:48 -0800, Charles & Mambo Duckman
<duckman@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>Bhartrhari wrote:
>
>> Brahman
>>
>
>First of all, you have to show that Brahman actually is a deity in the
>strict sense of the word. Any time that terms like "transcendent reality",
>"sum of the Universe", "consciousness" and "world soul" are bandied about,
>it just indicates that we're dealing with mushy, fuzzy and completely
>fabricated concepts that someone pulled out of his ass at some time in the past.
>Next, if Brahman stands for the "sum of the Universe", then it is nothing
>more than the Universe itself, so we can simply discard it as an irrelevant
>synonym.
Worse than that, they're mostly meaningless gobbledygook.
.
- References:
- Re: An Atheist's Faith
- From: Charles & Mambo Duckman
- Re: An Atheist's Faith
- Prev by Date: Re: An Atheist's Faith
- Next by Date: Re: The wrath of God?
- Previous by thread: Re: An Atheist's Faith
- Next by thread: Re: An Atheist's Faith
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|