Re: Juries and accidents (Re: teaching little boys ..)

on 7 Dec 2005 20:55:38 -0500, Penelope Periwinkle stated:
>
>On 7 Dec 2005 08:27:44 -0500, Allison Turner-
><betonica@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>on 6 Dec 2005 22:29:19 -0500, Penelope Periwinkle stated:
>>>>on 3 Dec 2005 12:11:03 -0500, Allison Turner- stated:
>>>
>>>>So. Whaddya think?
>>>
>>>I think that every time I get into a discussion like this with
>>>you, you reject everything I have to say, so, what *I* think is
>>>that I'll put my energy into more productive endeavors.
>>
>>Good heavens.
>>Where did that come from?
>
>Experience.
>
>
>>I'm thinking I've missed a bunch of major stuff, somewhere.
>
>The key words up there are "like this".
>
>I don't know why you act so surprised, I've said much the same
>thing to you before. You seemed to have assumed I meant all of
>our conversations, which I didn't. Narrow your scope.
>
>
>>I was recently remembering the interchanges you've been
>>referring to (if I have the correct ones) that you've said
>>you were ripped to shreds for. The one thing that I remember
>>the most clearly from that was when I said I really didn't
>>get why some of the conversation around here was exclusionary,
>>and you explained. And I got it. That was cool.
>
>It didn't touch you, personally.


Ok.

Let me say right here and now, I really don't know
what you're talking about. I know something is
wrong, and that you don't like something about the
way I've handled some sort of conversations with
you including something recent ("like this" where I
don't have a reference for whatever "this" is).
Beyond that vague concept, I'm clueless.

If you want to explain, I'm interested. If you'd
rather not bother, that's fine, too. Though if
you don't want to talk about it, I wish you hadn't
brought the issue up. Leaves me in the nasty
position of being in the wrong with no way to know
what to do to correct things, or even what it was
I did.


-Allison

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Juries and accidents (Re: teaching little boys ..)
    ... Whaddya think? ... >>that I'll put my energy into more productive endeavors. ... >I was recently remembering the interchanges you've been ...
    (soc.singles.moderated)
  • Re: Einsteins E=mc2 was Italians idea
    ... titled "Does the inertia of a body depend on its energy content?", ... It was known long before that energy could come from mass. ... was referring to the longer form of the equation that had momentum as ... What if it's moving at the same speed away from you as you kick it? ...
    (alt.machines.cnc)
  • Re: Potential energy in Einsteins 1905 Relativity
    ... context we can deduce that when he writes "energy of the body" he is ... referring to its total energy. ... additive constant C, that when added to the kinetic energy K_0 you ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Where do you run??
    ... purpose. ... Perhaps you could redirect your energy to more productive endeavors ...
    (rec.running)
  • Re: What kind of energy denotes E in Einsteins 1905 Sep 27paper?
    ... Einstein starts referring to a body at rest with energy E. I ... radiation carried away the mass. ... are ideal gases which have only kinetic energy. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)