Re: A Fun Show
- From: "Evelyn" <evelyn.ruut@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 09:59:38 -0400
"Dan C" <youmustbejoking@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:pan.2009.05.30.03.24.41@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 29 May 2009 21:07:51 -0500, High Miles wrote:
Dan C wrote:
You didn't answer the question. Why were you deliberately deceptiveAre you kidding, or are you that dim ???? It's a common practice and
and try to make it appear that I said something I didn't? The evidence
is still there in the post I made, that you snipped all the context out
of.
Why'd you do that? What are you trying to prove? That you have no
integrity and will stoop as low as you need to in order to make a
point? Is that what you want to be seen as?
done every day. The slop I eliminated was pointless.
The post was merely a shot at your pomposity. Apparently it hit the mark
eh ?
Wrong, again. I am well aware that trimming a post of "slop" is done
every day. That's not the issue here. Let me try to make this easier to
understand for you:
Here's the relevant portion of my post that we are talking about:
It is on MSNBC cable. Only on weeknights, and the lineup is
absolutely awesome. If you are a democrat it is THE channel to
watch.
True.
So much better than FOX!
Yes, it is. They tell it like it is.
Wow. *Completely* suckered in. Amazing.
OK. That line above, where I said "Wow..." was what I said to *Evelyn*,
in regard to *her* being completely suckered in by the propaganda on
MSNBC. Are you with me so far?
Now, what you posted, in it's *entirety* (snipping out everything but
what I'm pasting right here below) was:
Wow. *Completely* suckered in. Amazing.
It's bold of you to admit to the world that you were COMPLETELY suckered
in by the shrub and his criminal clan. Perhaps by now you've learned a
valuable lesson about trusting those phone conservatives ?
You tried to make it *appear* that I admitted to being suckered in,
*MYSELF*, and then threw in some cheap insults at Bush and
conservatives. You know damn well that my quote about being suckered in
was directed to Evelyn, regarding the MSNBC channel, and was no
"admission" on my part at all.
You deliberately twisted the context to make it appear that I said
something that I did NOT say.
Do you see now? Very unethical and very indicative of the kind of person
that you are. Deceitful and without integrity.
Do you have any argument against what I've said here? Can you deny any
of it? What say you?
I don't care what you say Dan, I happen to believe that MSNBC sees the world and politics as close to my own as possibly can be. They are MY voice.
I do listen to other news, but I admit that FOX is not on my roster of news sources. That is because they are too prejudiced, too unrealistic for the demographics of this country, and too divorced from reality. I catch them in lies all the time. Even my husband, who was a devoted FOX news junkie, realizes now how they lie.
--
Evelyn
The fool thinks he has won a battle when he bullies with harsh speech, but knowing how to be forbearing alone makes one victorious.
Samyutta Nikaya I, 163
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A Fun Show
- From: Dan C
- Re: A Fun Show
- From: Bill Baka
- Re: A Fun Show
- References:
- Re: A Fun Show
- From: High Miles
- Re: A Fun Show
- From: Dan C
- Re: A Fun Show
- From: High Miles
- Re: A Fun Show
- From: Dan C
- Re: A Fun Show
- From: High Miles
- Re: A Fun Show
- From: Dan C
- Re: A Fun Show
- Prev by Date: Re: A Fun Show
- Next by Date: Re: 2 Democrats Spearheading Health Bill Are Split
- Previous by thread: Re: A Fun Show
- Next by thread: Re: A Fun Show
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
