Re: A Fun Show

On Fri, 29 May 2009 12:04:54 -0500, High Miles wrote:

Dan C wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009 10:00:39 -0500, High Miles wrote:

Dan C wrote:


Wow. *Completely* suckered in. Amazing.


It's bold of you to admit to the world that you were COMPLETELY
suckered in by the shrub and his criminal clan. Perhaps by now you've
learned a valuable lesson about trusting those phone conservatives ?

Interesting how you snipped out the relevant context that I was
replying to, to make it appear as if I meant something else, and then
make a strawman argument and attempt to put words in my mouth. Sorry,
but that tactic is quite obvious and transparent to anyone who knows
anything.

Why did you do that? Do you think it makes you look good to attempt to
deceive like that?


I AM good - you are a cranky piss pot, and need to be pegged down.

You didn't answer the question. Why were you deliberately deceptive and
try to make it appear that I said something I didn't? The evidence is
still there in the post I made, that you snipped all the context out of.

Why'd you do that? What are you trying to prove? That you have no
integrity and will stoop as low as you need to in order to make a point?
Is that what you want to be seen as?


--
"Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Ahhhhhhhh!: http://brandybuck.site40.net/pics/relieve.jpg
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A Fun Show
    ... It's bold of you to admit to the world that you were COMPLETELY suckered ... in by the shrub and his criminal clan. ...
    (soc.senior.issues)
  • Re: A Fun Show
    ... It's bold of you to admit to the world that you were COMPLETELY suckered ... in by the shrub and his criminal clan. ...
    (soc.senior.issues)
  • Re: A Fun Show
    ... It's bold of you to admit to the world that you were COMPLETELY ... suckered in by the shrub and his criminal clan. ...
    (soc.senior.issues)