Re: Good topic of conversation



"Nantz" <thenantz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1181741360.195921.91090@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jun 13, 12:24 am, noname <non...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:00:07 -0400, "Nixon.D" <nixo...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:







>"Robert" <sab...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
>> Religion has also played a major role in the mass slaughter of both >> women
>> and men

>> Robert
>===============================================================

>You write the truth, Robert. However, Religion is only ONE of many >factors
>inherent to the human condition. One could say the same for Sexual
>Activities, Quests for food, Striving for Wealth, etc., etc., etc. . . . >.

>Life is unfair.

>Also, it seems to me that these women are trying to take over this >miserable
>newsgroup! Do you get that impression ?? The HighMiserableMiles is >their
>leader! Like most Atheists she strives to make all around her >miserable;
>she has yet to find the "WAY".
>McDave of Merryland
>=============================================

Oh how the shoe pinches when it is on the other foot! Women are
not trying to take over the newsgroup but we do feel free to express
our opinions -- without submitting them first to the scrutiny of
a man. If the women here don't appreciate your take on things,
why do you assume the problem is them and not you?

You are the epitome of the patriarchal male personality. So you
whine, "I don't get no respect."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
++++++++++++++++
In the 6 or 7 years I've been with this group I don't remember even
one single person agreeing with Nixon. He does tend to use the "royal
we" when in self defence mode, but where is this "we"? If he could
ever come up with just one sincere post, not this Foghorn Leghorn
character bluster and bluff but a real person, it would be a welcome
treat. I can't imagine the man having one real friend in life because
he never says what is in his heart, just what he thinks he should say
in defence of his character. Sad.

Nantz

Yes. But I am sure you will agree there are far worse characters on usenet that we see from time to time. McDave is just a little blind,...... some are real psychopaths with computers.

--
Best Regards,

Evelyn




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: "Balls!!!", said Gus Webb.
    ... I haven't studied her life or philosophy at all myself, ... religion was not really my main focus and it definitely ... felt the Roark character was way too unbelievable. ... other very interesting designs. ...
    (rec.games.pinball)
  • Re: unrecognizable characters in IE 6
    ... "Chris G" wrote in message ... as Unicode characters and being displayed as who knows what. ... positions which don't have a character in the character set being used. ... Robert ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6.browser)
  • Re: using KEBOARD into a EditBox with InputMask
    ... are stuffing the character? ... > form's procedure that does the actual stuffing of a newly-entered ... > Robert wrote: ... >>>>>difficult for the entry operators to screw up. ...
    (microsoft.public.fox.programmer.exchange)
  • Re: Limit .find to one pass
    ... "Robert H" skrev i meddelelsen ... Dim r As Long ... 'Copy the right-most character to the next column ... Loop Until ActiveCell.Address = startCell.Address ...
    (microsoft.public.excel.programming)
  • Re: Definition of "frum" :-)
    ... Too bad there is no independent historical evidence that *Jesus* ever ... The Talmud has lots of such evidence. ... possible that some or other religion might have used the name of this ... character in some of their myths, it's also possible that they didn't. ...
    (soc.culture.jewish.moderated)