Re: Religions
- From: DaveInLakeVilla@xxxxxxxxx (Dave in Lake Villa)
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 15:57:40 -0500
'You just don't get it Dave. This newsgroup is not set up for purposes
of christian debate. '
REPLY: No, i dont get it . It matters not what kind of NG this is ;
you made an absolute derogatory declaration about Christians and if
youre not willing to prove your point, then you spoke very
presumptuously.
'It strains the patience of many people here just to have to deal with
you peddling your religion in the first place. If they have to deal with
continuing religious debate, it will strain their patience even more. '
REPLY: Luckily, the consensus of opinion isnt whats important as I
dont live for the applause of men/women by automatically siding with
popular opinion. Im interested in the truth and the scientific evidence
that supports it. If your particular belief system is only based on
what makes you feel good, then youve done a disservice to yourself.
'I feel quite comfortable in my own spiritual practice and traditions.
Sorry if that bothers you, but it is the way it is.'
REPLY: But truth isnt based on acquiring the fuzzies and
willy-nillyness ; its grounded on scientific validity, historical
verifiability, and objective concrete observation. Practicing the art
of religion and traditions might make you feel good and acquire friends
with like minds , but if you end up missing what the real truth is
regarding God, then you miss out on eternity. It only bothers me from
the standpoint that youve chosen something which might feel good to you,
but denies the Global Plan that God has for all of mankind thruout the
centuries. Do u understand the implications to this Evelyn ?
.
- References:
- Re: Religions
- From: Evelyn Ruut
- Re: Religions
- Prev by Date: Re: On Jefferson's Flaws
- Next by Date: Re: A Creationist Museum of "Unnatural" History
- Previous by thread: Re: Religions
- Next by thread: Re: Religions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
