Re: Recap



Alan Lichtenstein wrote:
> bob wrote:
> > I thought I'd cut through all the running around in circles and try to
> > bring this down to managable levels.
> >
> > I get from your posts;
> >
> > -You are absolutely convinced that Bush is very stupid and evil, and
> > that all else follows........
>
> Glad to see that you finally got the message.
>
> > -Judging from your posts, you seem to believe this because;
> >
> > - - The media told you so and others have repeated it.
>
> And just when I thought your reading comprehension skills were on a par
> with a good eighth-grader, you go and disappoint me by failing to
> comprehend what was written. Actually, what I said was that I am not
> the only one who believes he is stupid; others have said it, and in fact
> have coined the phrase. In fact so many others have said it, that it
> can be described as 'common knowledge.' You know, the same kind of
> common knowledge that YOU use to know things, like your assertions about
> the motivations and actions of various politicians in a post you authored.
>
> so, what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
>
> > - - And, because of your penetrating and infallable personal analysis
> > of all his works.....
>
> It works because it happens to be true, despite your ego-saving devices
> of denial and avoidance. Added to your failure to divorce philosophy
> from the person, and thus getting caught in the cult of personality.
>
> > - Your unshakable conviction that you cannot possibly be wrong leads
> > you to conclude that the reasons that I choose to be so offensive as to
> > doubt the near biblical nature and rightness of your utterances is that
> > I am a reactionary, in the grip of a personality cult and/or in ego
> > preserving denial.
>
> Sort of like Bush, isn't it? You should have no trouble with that if
> you haven trouble with Bush.
>
> > I won't even bother to recap my bemused (and amused) reaction to it all
> > beyond pointing out that I am somewhat less impressed with your
> > reasoning than are you.
>
> YOU need to be have no to be impressed; you aren't, being a reactionary.
>
> > I think that pretty well covers it. What remains to be said????
>
> Sigh. I need to remind you not to try to think; you get in trouble when
> you try to think.
>
I stand by my RECAP.

bob

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Change
    ... Anyone against Bush must be a Liberal ... TMT keeps confusing Conservative and NeoCon which are two totally ... Obama after he takes office. ... Stop it, Bob. ...
    (misc.survivalism)
  • Re: Lets just keep on electing Republicans
    ... actually invading when those inspectors revealed that Saddam did not ... Nice song-and-dance Bob. ... because they were "duped" into that belief by the Bush admin into. ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: "God Told me to Invade"
    ... >>I don't beat around the bush or around the Bush. ... >>against Islam. ... >>Bob Kolker ... >>If you took a little Moslem baby and brought it up in some goy ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Gosh...the silence..again is killing me
    ... You are seeing things in black and white, Bob. ... Describes himself as a "Bush supporter" ... repeating the Bush-apologist propaganda lie that Clinton's unwarranted ... You are an amusing guy, ...
    (rec.music.gdead)
  • Re: "God Told me to Invade"
    ... >toward al Islam, "the religion of peace" as our Fearless Leader has said. ... >I don't beat around the bush or around the Bush. ... >Bob Kolker ... >If you took a little Moslem baby and brought it up in some goy ...
    (talk.origins)