Why the Bush Administration "Watergated" Eliot Spitzer
- From: mg <mgkelson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 11:00:55 -0600
"The spectacular and highly bizarre release of secret FBI wiretap data
to the New York Times exposing the tryst of New York state Governor,
Eliot Spitzer, the now-infamous "No.9," with a luxury call-girl, had
less to do with the Bush Administration?s pursuit of high moral
standards for public servants. Spitzer was likely the target of a
White House and Wall Street dirty tricks operation to silence one of
its most dangerous and vocal critics of their handling the current
financial market crisis.
A useful rule of thumb in evaluating spectacular scandals around
prominent public figures is to ask what and who might want to
eliminate that person. In the case of Governor Eliot Spitzer, a
Democrat, it is clear that the spectacular "leak" of government FBI
wiretap records showing that Spitzer paid a high-cost prostitute
$4,300 for what amounted to about an hour?s personal entertainment,
was politically motivated. The press has almost solely focused on the
salacious aspects of the affair, not least the hefty fee Spitzer
apparently paid. Why the scandal breaks now is the more interesting
Spitzer became Governor of New York following a high-profile record as
a relentless State Attorney General going after financial crimes such
as the Enron fraud and corruption by Wall Street investment banks
during the 2002 dot.com bubble era. The powerful former head of the
large AIG insurance group, Hank Greenburg was among his detractors. He
made powerful enemies by all accounts. He was bitterly hated on Wall
Street. He had made his political career on being ruthless against
financial corruption. Most recently, from his position as Governor of
the nation?s second largest state, and home to its financial industry,
Spitzer had begun making high profile attacks on the complicity of the
Bush Administration in covertly arranging bailout if its Wall Street
financial friends at the expense of ordinary homeowners and citizens,
paid all with taxpayer funds.
Curiously, Spitzer, who had been elected governor in 2006 defeating a
Republican by winning nearly 70 percent of the vote, has been not
charged in any crime. However, the day the scandal broke New York
Assembly Republicans immediately announced plans to impeach Spitzer or
put him on public trial were he to refuse resignation. Spitzer could
be asked to testify in any trial involving the Emperors Club
prostitution ring. But so far he hasn?t been charged with a crime.
Prostitution is illegal in most US states, but clients of prostitutes
are almost never charged, nor are their names usually leaked in a case
in process. The Spitzer case is in the hands of Washington and not
state authorities, underscoring the clear political nature of the
The New York Times said Spitzer was an individual identified as Client
9 in court papers filed last week. Client 9 arranged to meet with
"Kristen," a prostitute who officially charged $1,000 an hour, on
February 13 in a Washington hotel. Whatever transpired, Spitzer paid
her $4,300, according to the official documents. The case is clearly
political when compared with more egregious recent cases involving
Republicans. Republican Mark Foley was exposed propositioning male
interns in Congress and Rudolph Giuliani was discovered cheating on
his wife, but no or few Republican calls for resignations were heard.
Why the attack now?
Spitzer had become increasingly public in his blaming the Bush
Administration for the nation?s current financial and economic
disaster. He testified in Washington in mid-February before the US
House of Representatives Financial Services subcommittee on the
problems in New York-based specialized insurance companies, known as
"monoline" insurers. In a national CNBC TV interview the same day, he
laid blame for the crisis and its broader economic fallout on the Bush
Spitzer recalled that several years ago the US Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency went to court and blocked New York State
efforts to investigate the mortgage activities of national banks.
Spitzer argued the OCC did not put a stop to questionable loan
marketing practices or uphold higher underwriting standards.
"This could have been avoided if the OCC had done its job," Spitzer
said in the interview. "The OCC did nothing. The Bush Administration
let the housing bubble inflate and now that it's deflating we're
dealing with the consequences. The real failure, the genesis, the germ
that has spread was the subprime scandal," Spitzer said. Fraudulent
marketing and very low "teaser" mortgage rates that later ballooned
higher, were practices that should have been stopped, he argued. "When
mortgages are being marketed, there is a marketplace obligation to
ensure the borrower can afford to pay back the debt," he said.
That TV interview was only one instance of Spitzer laying blame on the
Bush Republicans. On February 14, Spitzer published a signed article
in the influential Washington Post titled, "Predatory Lenders' Partner
in Crime: How the Bush Administration Stopped the States From Stepping
In to Help Consumers."
That article, laying clear blame on the Administration for the
development of the sub-prime crisis, appeared the day after his
ill-fated tryst with the prostitute at the Mayflower Hotel. Just a
coincidence? Spitzer wrote, ""In 2003, during the height of the
predatory lending crisis, the OCC invoked a clause from the 1863
National Bank Act pre-empting all state predatory lending laws,
thereby rendering them inoperative. The OCC also promulgated new rules
that prevented states from enforcing any of their own consumer
protection laws against national banks."
In his article Spitzer charged, "Not only did the Bush administration
do nothing to protect consumers, it embarked on an aggressive and
unprecedented campaign to prevent states from protecting their
residents from the very problems to which he federal government was
turning a blind eye." Bush, said Spitzer right in the headline, was
the "Predator Lenders' Partner in Crime." The President, said Spitzer,
was a fugitive from justice. And Spitzer was in Washington to launch a
campaign to take on the Bush regime and the biggest financial powers
on the planet. Spitzer wrote, "When history tells the story of the
sub-prime lending crisis and recounts its devastating effects on the
lives of so many innocent homeowners the Bush administration will not
be judged favourably."
With that article, some Washington insiders believe, Spitzer signed
his own political death warrant."
- Prev by Date: Re: Send a Birthday Message to Michelle Bachman
- Next by Date: Re: 78% Think Jesus Christ Rose from the Dead
- Previous by thread: Re: where is our economy heading?
- Next by thread: Re: Why the Bush Administration "Watergated" Eliot Spitzer