Re: The White House's Bad Drug Deal


"Rita" <Rita@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:337r759neu3mg4qq7s8jk9m1jdo54oavp8@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 08 Aug 2009 11:12:32 -0400, Jim Higgins
<gordian238@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hal Hanig wrote:
"Jim Higgins" <gordian238@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:g6qdnXHfFrYN0eDXnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The White House's Bad Drug Deal
http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2009/08/white-houses-bad-drug-deal

Obama's sellout on health care is hardly any secret, but this week's
news of an outright backroom deal guaranteeing drug makers control over
pricing is one for the history books. Even the Republicans didn't lay
down for big business quite like this.

As it now stands, there is no control over drug pricing in the US (save
for a gesture in that direction under the Medicare Part D prescription
drug insurance plan for the elderly). The system allows drug firms to
set prices for prescription drugs under Medicare, in what amount to
sweetheart deals with private insurance companies. Because drug pricing
and insurance costs are set-basically at will-by these two industries,
critics have demanded the government step in and set prices. Those
demands haven't gone anywhere, but never has there been an explicit
announcement from on high about the arrangement. It's always been just
another one of Washington's dirty little secrets.


Here is the way the Times reported it, along with an extraordinary
public concession from the President:

"We were assured: 'We need somebody to come in first. If you come
in first, you will have a rock-solid deal,' " Billy Tauzin, the former
Republican House member from Louisiana who now leads the pharmaceutical
trade group, said Wednesday. "Who is ever going to go into a deal with
the White House again if they don't keep their word? You are just going
to duke it out instead."
A deputy White House chief of staff, Jim Messina, confirmed Mr.
Tauzin's account of the deal in an e-mail message on Wednesday night.
"The president encouraged this approach," Mr. Messina wrote. "He
wanted to bring all the parties to the table to discuss health insurance
reform."

As for the drug company's $80 billion voluntary gift to the President to
help achieve the appearance of bi-partisan health care reform, it's all
smoke and mirrors. No more than $20 billion will go to help Medicare
recipients. The rest is to be doled out according to some unknown plan
set forth by the drug makers. And the money to help the elderly is
limited to brand-name drugs, many of them coming off patent and about to
go generic. The industry wants to keep on selling the more expensive
brand-name versions, and thus will supposedly subsidize the elderly to
buy those products. Put another way, a person covered under Medicare
could save money under the existing plan if he/she buys generics. Under
the Big Pharma plan, elderly people who choose the name-brand drug will
get a subsidy to keep them from switching to generics that would save
money across the entire system.

Perhaps this might be the appropriate time to remind you that politics is
"the art of the possible" and that politicians often will settle for what
they can get while fully aware that it isn't nearly enough. Rome was not
built in one day, but one does what one can and keeps on chipping away at
the problem in order to reduce it to its most manageable size.

If you're going to fuss about how little we're going to get, you can still
be sure that it'll be miles ahead of what we got over the past four decades,
when nothing was accomplished. Or, are you comfortable with that kind of
progress? To me, anything is better than nothing and, if I can't get all
that I think we need, I'll be here to fight for improvements again another
day.

Hal



The disappointing thing is that this administration billed itself as an
agent of major change. Rolling over for Big Pharma/Insurance is not the
kind of change I can believe in. Will it be miles ahead of what we have
had? That really remains to be seen. If this is stalled off until the
New Year for more "careful consideration and refinement" then we have
lost. There will certainly be lipstick on the Pig but no solid
substance. I believe promises, that words mean things and lose faith
with those that I feel have deceived me-aka the GOP until mid '06.

Much was promised during the campaign, chiefly "Change you can believe
in". If I find that the change was bogus then I turn on those that
deceived me-as anyone else should. Go back to the GOP? NO WAY IN HELL!

Would you prefer to have no bill at all pass? Surely you can see that
given the Congress we have at the moment it is going to take some
give and take to pass anything at all?

Call what can be achieved now a downpayment on the future and don't
throw out the baby with the bath water, Jim.

Did you really believe there would be no compromises required --
that Obama's wishes would just sail though with no changes?

It's all that Hope and Change-flavored Kool-aid Higgins swills every day, it has dulled his brain, but then again, he was never the sharpest knife in the drawer.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The White Houses Bad Drug Deal
    ... Obama?s sellout on health care is hardly any secret, ... there is no control over drug pricing in the US (save ... The rest is to be doled out according to some unknown plan ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: The White Houses Bad Drug Deal
    ... Obama?s sellout on health care is hardly any secret, ... there is no control over drug pricing in the US (save ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • LA Times: Medicare drug snafus
    ... Drug Plan Chaos -- Is It Cured? ... The government says the disastrous launch of new prescription benefits ... such problems have rankled Medicare beneficiaries - ...
    (talk.politics.misc)
  • =?windows-1252?Q?Medicare_Users_May_Find_Drug_Coverage?= =?windows-1252?Q?_Leaves_Them_With_
    ... Nov. 28 -- Renata Rafferty, a philanthropic adviser in Indian Wells, California, said she started cutting her husband’s pills in half when his Medicare drug coverage reached its limit and his monthly prescription bills shot up to $900. ... Gap coverage kicks in once consumers and their plan have $2,510 of drug costs. ... Consumers are then responsible for 100 percent of drug costs until they have paid $4,050, including what they paid as part of the $2,510. ...
    (soc.senior.issues)
  • Re: OT: the new republican "line"
    ... There's another advantage of universal health care: ... private insurance in addition to the basic coverage. ... Is health care going to address drug abuse? ... IYO...You really think drug companies and their investors like to ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)
Loading