Re: More Bought & Paid For: Blue Dog Boren Defends Private Insurers Against Public Plan


"Alan Lichtenstein" <arl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4a735ec1$0$10322$607ed4bc@xxxxxxxxx
Hal Hanig wrote:
(Snp)

The basis for my disagreement was to take issue with the singular idea
you presented. The way you wrote the post appears to suggest that this
is a singular reason which you use as a basis for your assertion. I
searched the thread and I could find no other qualifying remark or your
singling out other variables which would clarify this. Of course, I do
lack min dreading skills, and I can only reply to what you say, not what
you may mean.


Semantic and self-serving bull***. BTW, you lack many other skills, but
you'd be the last to be aware of them. Don't ask....I'm not feeling
friendly enough right now to be helpful.

Your problem is that you want to use a public forum to get up on a soapbox
and spout your views, and you don't want anyone to question any of them in
any shape fashion matter or form.

I thnik that it's perfectly normal to question someone who disagrees with me
immediately after I've gone out of my way to agree with him. That's a man
whose intellectual arrogance requires him to be right than to have anyone
have the audacity to agree with him. Good Lord.....I might have to share
some of my rightness with another lesser being!

Well, tough. This is Usenet, and that's the way it is. If you don't like
it, you get two choices. Either don't post or don't reply. Pick one.
You don't get any points except to assuage what is evidently a shallow ego
by a response such as the one you post above.

There's always the third option, i.e. - to continue to annoy the *** out of
you by pointing out your inadeqacies. You can't run me off. " If you don't
like it, you get two choices. Either don't post or don't reply. Pick one".

You could have given a polite answer and ended discussion, but no, not
you.

Pot vs. kettle. LOL!

.....You chose to begin a confrontation, and you did just fine.

Sure I did.....isn't agreeing with someone the best way to start a
confrontation? Sure it it. LOL!

.....So you can take your arrogant bull*** and your soapbox with you,
because before you offer help to anyone, address your own shortcomings
first. And you've got a number of them as well.

I? Offer to help you? When would I ever have done anything as stupid as
that? Since your thoughts brook no challenges, why would anybody offer to
help you perfect perfection? LOL!

(Snip)

Actually I do quite well at rubbing my belly and scratching my head at the
same time. But you apparently have trouble walking and chewing gum at the
same time.

Copycat!

.......And NOTHING you posted above leads anyone to believe that you
believe that other variables contribute to an even greater costliness than
the one you posted.

I didn't say "greater", and I did use the word "some" that most people other
than you would have accepted as my having left the door open to other
examples or interpretations.

Please explain how your 'logic' in the statement below was supposed to be
interpreted by others that among the various reasons the one you chose to
illustrate your point was not the major one in your thinking?

I'll listen.

Don't bother....if you don't get it, you don't get it. Apparently, you
don't.

(Snip)

Under those circumstances, forgive me for wondering why you bothered to
respond at all. You could just as easily have ignored my comments as
unworthy of your attention, but you chose not to.

I'll answer this because after this, I have nothing further to say to you.
Based on the way you treated me, you don't deserve a reply, but unlike
you, I'll address what you said and tell you why. then maybe next time,
you'll be a bit less volatile when someone disagree with you.

No need to bother.....there likely will be no "next time". I've already had
my belly full of your intellectual arrogance.

(Snip)

Hal


.

Loading