It is all mere formality...History look it up...Congress has only been
voting on SC Justices since the early 1900s. It was never in stone
anywhere prior to that. Some president appointed someone that was a
glaring bad choice and BAMO.
Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters. ... >>>substituted another (stone) document for the original??? ... >>>No. I'm arguing from the fact that the KRS was inspected by Holand ... >not occur significantly prior to 1362?? ... >I chose to cite the first link to an acceptable citation. ... (sci.archaeology)
Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters. ... >>substituted another (stone) document for the original??? ... >>No. I'm arguing from the fact that the KRS was inspected by Holand ... This business of Templars, secret codes, ... not occur significantly prior to 1362?? ... (sci.archaeology)
Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters. ... Holand took the stone to Europe to have it examined by experts. ...Templars who had been wiped out (and that's quite literal, ... confiscated) about 50 years prior to 1362, managed to put together a voyage ... >>> Nielsen and Wolter as saying. ... (sci.archaeology)
Re: ruth bader ginsberg..... ... differ in their voting from what the President who ... Everyone knows that the four Justices held in the highest ... esteem by Republicans are Chief Justice Earl Warren, William Brennan, ... (rec.sport.football.college)
Re: |[IRL] Didnt we already win this fight? ... So you have never heard of voting then? ... more understanding of the voting system?... Was his prior bet as stupid?... (rec.games.frp.dnd)
