Re: Jimmy Carter!!
- From: Islander <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 07:57:17 -0700
Hal Hanig wrote:
"Islander" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:q5udnZxA0bhJjqbXnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYes, I was in DC at the time and recall seeing a bank offering 32% interest on short term notes.Hal Hanig wrote:"Thumper" <jaylsmith@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:5gbl351jooj5b0kmcel2juims7tp98pum2@xxxxxxxxxxThe Navy, like any other human organization is subject to the politics of advancement. There are many reasons for an individual to elect some other career path rather than command. A good friend of mine, Annapolis graduate, father an admiral, served on boomers, elected to leave the Navy, attend Harvard, and achieve success in business. It was a choice, probably not a lot different from Carter's choice. The fact that he did not choose to climb the career ladder in the Navy is not evidence, in itself, that he was not qualified.On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:59:11 -0400, "Hal Hanig"I choose my words pretty carefully......"invariably" does NOT mean "always", as you seem to think. I use in in the sense of "usually", but that's still not "always".
<halhanig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Thumper" <jaylsmith@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageI disagree. The cream does NOT always rise to the top. Not al;l
news:cr6k35920raj8l0nf9nct8kkakd69n112q@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:33:14 -0400, "Hal Hanig"But the cream invariably does rise to the top.....they're the few that do
<halhanig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"High Miles" <2blues1723@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message>from Sadat's assassination.
news:u6e_l.14041$Dr4.3692@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Justine wrote:I don't know that I'd give him high grades for intelligence. He was aOn Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:20:52 -0400, Gary <not@xxxxxxxx> wrote:Bet you've never known anyone as intelligent or decent as Carter.
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:50:44 -0500, High MilesGary, did you ever know a village idiot who was dishonest? They are
<2blues1723@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Evelyn wrote:I never voted for Carter, as GA governor or president. Looking back"Olly Mensch" <lieselottea@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagePerhaps our most genuinely intellectual president.
news:12658-4A391216-883@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Alan - - Jimmy Carter is in the middle East yet again. This is theHe is a truly great statesman and ambassador.
Jimmy Carter who, not too long ago, put a wreath on Arafat's
grave!! -
He (Jimmy) sent a message to Obama to please remove Hamas from the
terrorist list!!!
What I wish for Jimmy is unprintable!!
Olly
... I regret it.
Although I disagreed with him politically (when I was younger and
dumber) -- I must admit that Carter was probably the only honest man
who held the office of POTUS in my lifetime. And that time frame
stretches from FDR til now.
simple folk.
Justine
And what have you done for humanity in all your years here ?
nuclear submarine officer who never was good enough to entrusted with the
command of one, and I think that he was in over his head when he was
elected
to the Oval Office. He may have been decent, but apart from his
post-Presidential contribution to Habitat for Humanity, please share with
me
some of the wonderful legacy such an intelligent man would have left
behind
after his term of office was completed. I can't think of a single thing
beyond Billy Beer, management of the White House tennis court schedule and
a
botched rescue attempt of our Embassy hostages in Iran most generally
attributed to micro mis-management from the Oval Office rather than any
lack
of skill or ineptness by those assigned to make the rescue. Anwar Sadat
used him to create the Camp David Accords which resulted in Sadat
receiving
the Nobel Peace Prize jointly with Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin
and
which, in retrospect didn't change a single thing in the Middle East apartI just cannot think of anything he did as President that reflectedThe vast majority of Nuclear Sub officers never command one. There
anything
of value to the nation or the world, for that matter.
Hal
aren't all that many to command.
THumper
get selected. Jimmy wasn't one of them.
Hal
officers yearn to be in command of a ship. He was an engineering
type.
Thumper
IAC, as a retired military type, let me reassure you that most (and I do not mean "all") officers consider a command as a prerequisite for a continued successful career, and that would include those performing duties in engineering, human resource, and logistics fields as well as others. It may be something else nowadays, but that's the way it was in my day.
Hal
Carter assumed the Presidency at a time of crisis and faced many challenges. In many respects, he inherited the mess left by the Republican administrations of Nixon and Ford. As we look back now, he was right in a lot of his decisions, but right doesn't always count for much in the eyes of history. To his credit, he did not retire, but continued work in many areas including as a statesman. I cannot think of any other President who did as much good after serving as the Chief Executive. Can you?
The quality of his post-Presidency service has already been acknowledged. What's still open to discussion are those good things that his supporters claim he did while in office.......I asked for the list but it has yet to appear. Feel free to enlighten me and his other misguided critics who think poorly of his service while he presided over the worst inflation our nation ever suffered....at least in my lifetime.
Hal
But, it is not the worst inflation you have seen. While inflation reached 14.76% in March of 1980, it was considerably higher, 19.67% in March of 1947.
The major criticism of Carter is that he was not able to stem inflation despite cutting federal spending (and reducing the deficit), capping federal salaries, and other measures within his control. The surprising thing is that inflation ended fairly quickly in 1982 after Carter's administration despite the massive Reagan tax cuts in that same year which would be expected to be inflationary! It is argued by some economists (Friedman, for example) that the inflation seen in '79 through '81 were the consequence of monetary policy in the early '70s when inflation was not seen as such a bad thing. Friedman was constantly at odds with Fed Chairman Burns, Nixon appointee. In fact, the monetary policies of Nixon and Ford in their efforts to pump up the post Vietnam economy were seen as a direct cause. It is reasonable to argue that the end of the high inflation was, in fact, due to Carter's (actually Volker's) efforts. Reagan took the credit (just as he took the credit for freeing the Iranian hostages), but didn't deserve it.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Jimmy Carter!!
- From: Alan Lichtenstein
- Re: Jimmy Carter!!
- From: Hal Hanig
- Re: Jimmy Carter!!
- References:
- Re: Why are doctors vanishing? USA
- From: Alan Lichtenstein
- Re: Jimmy Carter!!
- From: Olly Mensch
- Re: Jimmy Carter!!
- From: Evelyn
- Re: Jimmy Carter!!
- From: High Miles
- Re: Jimmy Carter!!
- From: Justine
- Re: Jimmy Carter!!
- From: High Miles
- Re: Jimmy Carter!!
- From: Hal Hanig
- Re: Jimmy Carter!!
- From: Thumper
- Re: Jimmy Carter!!
- From: Hal Hanig
- Re: Jimmy Carter!!
- From: Thumper
- Re: Jimmy Carter!!
- From: Hal Hanig
- Re: Jimmy Carter!!
- From: Islander
- Re: Jimmy Carter!!
- From: Hal Hanig
- Re: Why are doctors vanishing? USA
- Prev by Date: Re: Will Seniors Kill Health Reform?
- Next by Date: I found this news site by accident. It appears to be real journalism and not the entertainment crap we see on TV.
- Previous by thread: Re: Jimmy Carter!!
- Next by thread: Re: Jimmy Carter!!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading