Re: Forget the Queen... Obama Bows to Saudi King?


"El Castor" <No_One@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ddcbt4tt6dmtj1osfro3eqbhpgv66nupmd@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:22:52 -0800, Rumpelstiltskin
<PleaseDoNotReplyByEmail@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 22:39:07 -0700 (PDT), CB <anonymousewho@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Apr 2, 9:20 pm, Rumpelstiltskin
<PleaseDoNotReplyByEm...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:57:28 -0600, Jim E <n...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mabybe you didn't watch the video, or maybe you didn't see the
picture, but more than likely you don't know what the hell you are
talking about.

You guys are pathetic.

Pathetic? You have forgotten how your gang of liberals were for the
past 8 years.

Everything changed on January 20th.

Get used to it lame brain.

Charlie


I think we were bitching about Bush torturing people,
starting an unnecessary war on false pretenses with
insufficient forces then running it completely
incompetently, and running up the debt for no reason
except that Republicans don't think they have to pay
taxes for anything because as long as rich people
are made richer, then they'll open their bounty to the
populace so deficits won't matter. After all, if you
don't pay, everything will work out just fine anyway,
right? Didn't Reagan prove that already? That was
before we even knew that Bush had totally trashed
government oversight.

I realize that doesn't stack up well you thinking that
Obama was bowing too low to a Saudi prince to suit
you, but sorry, it's all we got, lame brain.


As I recall, you spent most of your time bitching about Bush's
deficits. ....

You recall incorrectly and your memory has failed you. There were tons of
bitches about the yellow cake that amounted to nothing, the aluminum tubes
purchased for reasons other than use in nuclear weapons, the non-existent
WMDs, the missing truckloads of US dollars, the hiding of US casualties from
the view of the American public and loads of other things before we even got
to the burdgeoning deficit.

(Snip)

Hal


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Math schmath!
    ... - about the cost to pay off the unions... ... deficits totaling $547 billion over the coming decade." ... So the SS Trust Fund, consisting of treasury obligations, does not represent real economic assets? ... If that's true it means that all other treasury obligations from treasury bonds held by private investors to the bills in your wallet are also not "real economic assets" which is, of course, absolute nonsense. ...
    (misc.news.internet.discuss)
  • Re: Math schmath!
    ... of these mantras as any liberal *ideas*. ... If by paying for themselves you mean that taxes collected today pay ... deficits totaling $547 billion over the coming decade." ... "These [Trust Fund] balances are available to finance future benefit ...
    (misc.news.internet.discuss)
  • Re: Math schmath!
    ... End Bush's tax cuts for the filthy, putrid rich? ... SS taxes pay for themselves! ... deficits totaling $547 billion over the coming decade." ...
    (misc.news.internet.discuss)
  • Re: Math schmath!
    ... of these mantras as any liberal *ideas*. ... If by paying for themselves you mean that taxes collected today pay ... deficits totaling $547 billion over the coming decade." ... national security funding. ...
    (misc.news.internet.discuss)
  • Re: OT : "Fiscal Cliff"
    ... That alone accounts for much of the reason why ... GWB's deficits were lower than Obama's. ... President Bush had not signed a budget... ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)