Re: Talking in Points
- From: "Jerry Okamura" <okamuraj005@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 13:46:07 -1000
"mg" <mgkelson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:022b4c04-a464-44c1-9374-fedb4b2d8c68@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Oct 12, 11:11 am, "Jerry Okamura" <okamuraj...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"mg" <mgkel...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:fb31dae2-392b-4b41-b3bf-05df29c6f2b0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Oct 11, 12:50 pm, "Jerry Okamura" <okamuraj...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> "mg" <mgkel...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:37c40c03-c16b-4a0a-94b3-68ec7d945790@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Oct 10, 12:19 pm, "Jerry Okamura" <okamuraj...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > "mg" <mgkel...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >news:5f49410a-04f9-4071-b821-b46c9758601e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > On Oct 9, 5:37 pm, "Jerry Okamura" <okamuraj...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > "mg" <mgkel...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > >news:fe280853-b921-464e-8871-de180f4218ae@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > On Oct 9, 2:54 pm, "Jerry Okamura" <okamuraj...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > wrote:
> > > > Okay, that is fair. Now how about telling us about how poorly > > > > Biden
> > > > did
> > > > when he debated Palin. Tell us how many lies he told. Tell us how
> > > > well
> > > > he
> > > > did in understanding how our govenrment is run. I am willing to > > > > bet
> > > > you
> > > > won't touch that with a ten foot pole, because you know in > > > > advance,
> > > > whatever
> > > > your response would be, others in this group would tell you how
> > > > wrong
> > > > you
> > > > were.
> > > That's your job Jerry. Why don't you get on Google and do some
> > > research, and document that research, and then enlighten us with > > > what
> > > you found out?
> > > Why is it my job?
> > You're a Republican. It's your job to point out the problems with
> > Democrat politicians. Sig 'um.
> > Okay...here is a good start.... Are you prepared to prove that what is
> > listed are not the truth?
> I can see you did some work. So, I can't fault you there. The problem
> with right-wing "talking points" though is that they are usually very
> generalized and they fall apart on close examination. Another problem
> with right-wing talking point is that they usually use the shot gun
> approach in order to provide a lot of quantity to substitute for
> quality.
> In other words, you asked me to list what lies he told, and now you are
> not
> willing to dispute what I lsted as lies?
I did refute one of them very thoroughly, I think, and you didn't
respond.
I went back to check all of our exchanges, and NO youdid not refute even one
of them.....
I refuted the one on health insurance. See post number 7 above, on
Oct. 10, 2:40 PM
One out of how many, ten.....?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Talking in Points
- From: mg
- Re: Talking in Points
- References:
- Re: Talking in Points
- From: Jerry Okamura
- Re: Talking in Points
- From: mg
- Re: Talking in Points
- From: Jerry Okamura
- Re: Talking in Points
- From: mg
- Re: Talking in Points
- From: Jerry Okamura
- Re: Talking in Points
- From: mg
- Re: Talking in Points
- From: Jerry Okamura
- Re: Talking in Points
- From: mg
- Re: Talking in Points
- From: Jerry Okamura
- Re: Talking in Points
- From: mg
- Re: Talking in Points
- Prev by Date: Re: Political Parties Win, We Lose
- Next by Date: Republican leaders break ranks with McCain [UK]
- Previous by thread: Re: Talking in Points
- Next by thread: Re: Talking in Points
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|