Re: Obama's Remarks on Retirement Security

On Jun 20, 5:18 am, Rumpelstiltskin
<PleaseDoNotReplyByEm...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 04:10:04 -0700 (PDT), allan.san...@xxxxxxxxx
wrote:



On Jun 19, 9:01 pm, Rumpelstiltskin
<PleaseDoNotReplyByEm...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:25:52 -0700 (PDT), allan.san...@xxxxxxxxx
wrote:

On Jun 19, 6:19 pm, Islander <nos...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
allan.san...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Jun 19, 3:15 pm, Rumpelstiltskin
<PleaseDoNotReplyByEm...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:26:43 -0700, Islander <nos...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

<snip>

Nope. You still don't get it. But that is OK. I'm happy with with I
do and you are only wondering if you missed something important.. As
long as you are happy with your investment strategy, you should stick
with it.
I probably shouldn't stick my nose in here, but I get the
impression you were talking about reducing your taxes
to zero for a given year, whereas Allan was talking
about making a profit. Two completely different things.
If so, you've had a long exchange talking past each
other without resolving that, but maybe I'm missing
something and shouldn't have stuck my nose in.

You are always welcome to comment even if I may not agree with some
things you say.

I think Islander has painted himself into a corner and is unwilling to
admit it. If he can't explain how a 3 dollar gain offset by a 3
dollar loss somehow got him tax free income but can do it, it is too
good to be true. And you know what they say about things that sound
to good to b e true.

al

I have made a serious mistake here and it didn't have anything to do
with my math. The mistake was talking too much on usenet about my
personal finances. You seem like a decent person, but there is another
here who is attempting to cause me trouble. I've been audited, don't
like it, and while everything that I do is legal, jousting with the IRS
is time consuming, annoying, and can be expensive. So, I am dropping
this topic and will be more careful in the future.

Meanwhile, be careful of those who reveal personal information on
usenet. You never know what they will stoop to.

Congratulations on the consummate cop out. If I tell you I'd have to
kill you.

When you started I should have known better - my bad. Won't happen
again.

al

Oh, you haven't been around here long enough. There are
at least two people here quite capable of doing something like
that, though one of them might be out of commission since he
seems to me to be on the run from US law now, and he might
be leery of any dealings with the US government.

Well if the Islander is doing something illegal to avoid taxes he
deserves what he gets. I don't have a lot of confidence that he is
doing anything new or different than what any savvy investor does.
And his inability to describe what he does at all makes me even wonder
if he is in the savvy category.

al

I didn't see anything illegal in what he did. He balanced
selling winners and losers to avoid taxes, which is perfectly
legal. I've done it, as have most other people.

Of that I have no doubt. I'm still looking for the tax free income
that happens - which is what I was asking about. Like I said, either
what he does is illegal or what hew does doesn't generate any new
wealth, just converts existing wealth to consumption.

So much for the old horse.

He said that the audit didn't turn up anything illegal, but
that it was a huge hassle. I hate filling out tax forms, and
dread audits myself, even to the point that the most
important consideration by far for me in any financial deal
is whether it will complicate my taxes. So far, I've never
been audited.

I try to avoid complications but every year the Feds decide that they
need to increase them for me. And I have been audited - twice. Once
was random and the second they disallowed a deduction and then
reversed themselves. Apparently they are willing to admit they erred.

I've even said in this group that I'd be willing to go along
with a consumption tax as a *complete* replacement for
income tax, just to eliminate the worst day of most years,
the day I do taxes. Doing taxes is such a waste of time,
and far more a disruption of my serenity. If a proposed
replacement tax collection method weren't complete
though, and we still had to do tax forms, that would be
absolutely worthless because one would still have the
hassle of getting all one's information together and filling
out those accursèd forms. Taxes are the only reason I
ever have to bother figuring out how much money I get.

I agree - the consumption tax has a definite appeal. No one escapes
and the more you consume the more you pay. I just picked up Neal
Boortz Fair Tax book from a friend. It's a bit dated (2005) now but
will likely prove an interesting read.

-- begin tirade --

Those tax forms drive people of a mathematical bent
crazy, because they seem deliberately designed to mask
and thwart any semblance of logic. Pretty often I figure
out first what the heck the IRS is aiming at, then do a
one-minute calculation to see what the result should be,
then spend an hour filling out those damned forms and
going over them again because the result I get doesn't
match my one-minute calculation. The one-minute
calculation is always right. The problem is always that
I missed something or misplaced something on those
damned forms.

After I'm done, I still go over everything the
straightforward way to make sure the result I got on the
forms is reasonable, and I didn't miss putting something
in a box, or add up the wrong useless boxes, or add in
something senseless where I was supposed to but
then didn't remove it later where it was supposed to be
removed.

-- end tirade --

I have an accountant/tax guy - and I also started do my Federal using
Turbo Tax. The tax guy usually has a couple of alternatives that move
liability around but in the end the differences are nominal. I should
drop him, but he does other stuff too which makes filling out Turbo
easier. There is a lot of work just organizing the information BEFORE
you even start to fill in the forms. That's his job.

al
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Obamas Remarks on Retirement Security
    ... taxes in the first place, ... is that people who have already saved money have already ... were eliminated and consumption taxes initiated. ... I definitely would want to file something to get the tax money ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: Obamas Remarks on Retirement Security
    ... taxes in the first place, ... is that people who have already saved money have already ... were eliminated and consumption taxes initiated. ... I definitely would want to file something to get the tax money ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: Tax Cuts & Redistribution of Wealth
    ... how about this for a deduction: make them pay income tax but allow ... Consumption taxes are highly regressive. ...
    (alt.smokers.cigars)
  • Re: Clueless Media Strikes Again
    ... >>As to taxes relating to automobile use, I could see, esp. ... >>tax related to the efficiency of continued fuel use. ... > They are usually the ones that have considerably higher fuel consumption. ... Properly maintained vehicles pollute far less than poorly maintained ones. ...
    (sci.geo.satellite-nav)
  • Re: Middle Class Takes It In The Shorts With Bush
    ... Sinister also posted data proving that property taxes had declined, ... landowners a windfall through a steadily declining true tax rate as ... as _proved_ by the data sinister posted. ... typically decline, because land value increases faster than inflation. ...
    (sci.econ)
Quantcast