Re: A bipartisan call to draft Newt Gingrich
- From: Charlie <cbauwifl6@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:54:57 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 31, 12:31 pm, Rita <R...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:06:32 -0800 (PST), Charlie
<cbauwi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 31, 11:33 am, Gary <n...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:17:37 -0800 (PST), Charlie
<cbauwi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 31, 9:50 am, so...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
A bipartisan call to draft Newt Gingrich
Posted: January 31, 2008
By Perry Atkinson and Bob Just
(c) 2008
<snip>
No, Reaganism itself will never die, and Newt Gingrich is the man who
most represents those core conservative principles, not only in his
original thinking, but in his political track record, and most
importantly in his irrepressible determination to act out those "tried
and time-tested values" with real solutions for 21st century America..
Traditional Democrats and Republicans are looking for someone who "gets
it." We believe that man is Newt Gingrich of Georgia.
While I basically like and believe Newt is an exceptional thinker and
would make a *potentially* great POTUS or VPOTUS. I most want to be
sure we do not end up with either of the remaining democrats
candidates. It is my feeling that if the very conservative wing of the
Republican party could somehow swing what that is suggesting. We will
have Hussein Obama or Hitlery for our next president. Lets not get
stupid conservatives.
Charlie
I fell our with Newt back in 1998 due to his zipper problems. But
when I look at what's being offered by both parties, I'm truly
inclined to forget and forgive. Say what you will about Newt, he
is probably one of the two most savvy and intelligent politicians
practicing today. Slick is the other. And Newt is about as slick
as the male Clinton. If he will run, I'll support him.
But is too late for him to get in ? The Democrats are down to two
and the Republicans are reduced to three and a half. - Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I agree with you *totally* about Newt. AND I would vote for him. What
I said above indicates my opinion that he has been damaged so much
that it will cost the conservatives the election. AND FOR WHAT. Newt
will tell the "religious right" what they want to hear. He *is* a good
politician. But IMO Newt is like Reagan he will deliver nothing of
substance to the religious nuts. Just words. Reagan who I think was
the best president of my lifetime was not much of a religious man and
I am pretty sure Newt is not either.
Charlie, do you recall Newt confessed his sexual sins publicly to the
Rev. James Dobsom, a right wing preacher?
Doesn't that tell you something? I have no idea why he wished to
do that, but it just may have something to do with wanting that
support should he decide to make a presidential run.
So for a few BS statements he might get the GOP nomination and lose
the election to those who will cause real harm.
That is my opinion and I acknowledge is is worth no more than anyone
elses.
Charlie- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Oh yea I wanted to say how much I despize the one you mentioned, James
Dobson. Geez what arrogant sleaze.
Charlie
.
- References:
- Re: A bipartisan call to draft Newt Gingrich
- From: Charlie
- Re: A bipartisan call to draft Newt Gingrich
- From: Charlie
- Re: A bipartisan call to draft Newt Gingrich
- Prev by Date: Re: A bipartisan call to draft Newt Gingrich
- Next by Date: Re: Right wing talk radio attacks McCain
- Previous by thread: Re: A bipartisan call to draft Newt Gingrich
- Next by thread: Re: America's Most Miserable Cities
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|