Re: Arctic thaw may be at "tipping point"
- From: "Jerry Okamura" <okamuraj005@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 13:19:50 -1000
"Rumpelstiltskin" <PleaseDoNotReplyByEmail@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:94g2g39gepiqt7fn645696a4bse0p923mu@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 19:10:02 +0200 (CEST), Nomen NescioI have posted this same set of questions a number of times now, and I am still waiting for some answers....
<nobody@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No problem for conservatives, they never met an
ice bergy they didn't hate or a tree they did not
want to cut down.
*****
Arctic thaw may be at "tipping point"
There's no point talking to the lime-encrusted old farts
in soc.retirement about global warming. They're going
to keep insisting there's no such thing. The only thing
that will stop them proclaiming their denial is when the
water rises above the level of their mouths.
What will be the effects of Global Warming, and when will the effect be the worse?
How certain are the predictions of Global Warming (100% certainty, 90%, 50%)?
When will it happen, and what will happen and how certain are these predictions?
When will Global Warming reach its worst case scenario, and what is that worst case scenario? How certain are the predictions that the worst case scenario will happen? What are the other scenarios of what may happen? If you were to rank each scenario, what is the most likely scenario?
How big a reduction of greenhouses gases is required to avoid Global Warming, how much of a yearly reduction is required, how soon do we have the reach the yearly goal, what happens if we are not able to reach the yearly goal, and can anyone guarantee that we can avoid Global Warming, regardless of what we do?
Why concentrate on one of the greenhouse gases and not the other greenhouse gases?
What is the maximum rise in sea levels can we expect? I would think that answer can be found in determining how much sea levels will rise "if" all of the ice and snow melts.
Water on this earth is basically static, because none of it escapes from earth. It is either in the form of water, snow, ice, or in the atmosphere. And eventually, it will be returned to its natural form, which is water. So, what is evaporated, will eventually come back to the ground in the form of rain or snow. Where will it come back to earth? Won't the same amount of water that now returns to earth, be the same, if global warming should occur? One study suggested that the maximum rise in sea levels would be 263 feet, which if that happens would put a whole lot of land under water.
Let us for the sake of discussion say that the scientist are right and that if we do not do something to reduce the levels of Carbon Dioxide, global warming will happen. It would just seem to me, then the next question is how can we guarantee that the event will not happen, or can anyone make such a guarantee. What exactly, do we have to do, how fast do we have to do it, would be the next series of questions I would think needs to be answered. Have those scientist who are predicting such an event, know the answers to those questions? If they have the answer, what is the answer? Is there a consensus of what exactly has to be done? If there is no consensus, what should we do, and why is there no consensus?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Arctic thaw may be at "tipping point"
- From: John Galt
- Re: Arctic thaw may be at "tipping point"
- References:
- Arctic thaw may be at "tipping point"
- From: Nomen Nescio
- Re: Arctic thaw may be at "tipping point"
- From: Rumpelstiltskin
- Arctic thaw may be at "tipping point"
- Prev by Date: Re: 100,000 People Murdered in U.S. Since 9/11--None By Foreign Terrorists
- Next by Date: Re: Medical illiteracy deadly for older people
- Previous by thread: Re: Arctic thaw may be at "tipping point"
- Next by thread: Re: Arctic thaw may be at "tipping point"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|