Re: US to intensify fight against Qaeda after Iraq militia freeze

On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 11:50:25 -0500, Joe Avelone
<javalon2b@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

NoName wrote:
On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 10:41:19 -0700, Islander <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

George Z. Bush wrote:
Islander wrote:
Joe Avelon put on his GOP rose colored glasses and selectively edited
out any bad news from this story. Here is the whole story:

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/afp/20070901/twl-iraq-3cd7efd_3.html

Are those glasses official GOP standard issue, Joe?
Of course they are.....the two head knockers involved (al Maliki and Sadr)
are both Shiites and poor deluded Joe thinks that they're going to set aside
their 1,000 year old bitch with the Sunnis just to make the American
invaders happy. Whether Joe and the dum dums he admires acknowledge it or
not, we are uninvited guests in their country and they would all like to see
us get the hell out and the sooner the better. Hanging around there may
suit the political aims of the Oval Office but it's not going to stop the
killing of the Americans we've put in the middle of their civil war.

George Z.


It is hard for me to imagine how Joe can get his head into such a place.
It is not that he just ignores the bad news, but he selectively edits
these news items to eliminate any hint of something that might be
contrary to what he believes. That goes beyond ignorance. It is
partisan dishonesty. Perhaps he thinks that it is clever. Perhaps he
thinks that most people will believe anything that he posts. Perhaps he
aspires to emulate the Republican slime machine. Sad that he feels that
he has to go to these lengths to support an ideology that is failing so
disgracefully.

It is all too apparent he feels the portions of news stories he hides
are damaging to the administration. Thus that they must be excised to
make his case. Pitiful. If he did it once or twice I'd pay little
attention but it is his modus operandi.

And he refuses to explain why he does this. I'd say he is cowardly
as well because he can't stand by his actions.




Typical lib Bull***

I explained why I do what I do in thread, "Patriotic
Terrorists: Whose Side Are You On?" last month.

You participated in the thread, so there is no excuse for
failing to read my explanation.

Let me refresh your memory, "I try to edit out material(cut
the garbage) that has nothing to do with the subject line of
the post. When I find more information from others, I will add
it. That is good editing that's enriching the subject."

Ha, ha. That is hilarious. You edit out anything that doesn't
jibe with your biases. And call that "enriching the subject."
What a joker you are. If you had faith in your views they should
be able to stand scrutiny by telling the whole story.

But thanks for at least admitting your strategy.


.