Re: Lying
- From: Alan Lichtenstein <arl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 08:39:09 -0400
sordo™ @mini-tru.org wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 09:33:45 -0400, Alan Lichtenstein <arl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
marib wrote:
Alan Lichtenstein wrote:
Mark wrote:
Alan Lichtenstein wrote:
Mark wrote:
Alan Lichtenstein wrote:
sordo™ @mini-tru.org wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 09:02:04 -0700, Florida <demeter547opine@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Jul 6, 10:40 am, California Poppy <GoldenStatePo...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 5, 4:00?pm, Islander <nos...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jerry, whether you realize it or not, you are parroting the
Republican
line that all politics are corrupt as a way of excusing the
widespread
corruption in their party. Call me naive, if you wish, but I
don't
believe it. With today's capability to retrieve every public
statement
made by every would-be politician, the consequences for lying are
too
high.
Yes! The only way Republicans can win anything in the future is
to destabilize our entire political system... which they apparently
stand ready and willing to do.
Jefferson. If you want to accuse the Republican Party of
corruption,
just remember Jefferson of Louisiana.
Most people will remember Libby of Getoutofjailfree.
"'Scooter' Libby will serve as much time in prison for lying
under oath to a federal grand jury as Bill Clinton served for
lying under oath to a federal grand jury." --- Jack Kelly
And he will serve less jail time for committing a political crime than has Paris Hilton, who didn't.
Apples and oranges.
Exactly. Now tell that to sordo, the queer one in the asylum who posted the first inanity.
But Sordo isn't talking about Paris Hilton.
No. but his remarks are STILL apples and oranges. What one person did and what happened to that person has absolutely NOTHING to do with a second person. Apples and oranges. If you dismiss one comparison, you have to dismiss them all. You can't selectively choose which ones you want and which you don't. So, if you're willing to dismiss my comments as apples and oranges, which is a convenient way for you to avoid dealing with the comparison, then you similarly have to dismiss them all. And then, we can discuss the merits of Bush's pardon on its own merits and nothing more.
Are you prepared to do that?
Bush has the right to commute Scooter’s sentence and did so. Upon further reflection and research, Bush will conclude that Libby does indeed deserve a pardon – and he will get one.
<G>
Of course, you say the above with tongue in cheek, as you post your supercilious <G> after your comments. Meant to show the irony of what you post.
But of course you knew that, didn't you?
Now, don't you feel like the fool you are?
Like I stated many times before: "You above all, should discuss egos,
you pompous egotistical ass." You've only to read a couple of your posts
such as this one to prove my point.
Speaking of fools, the chief fool in residence weights in with the above.
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Have you ever ate sushi ?
- Next by Date: Re: Lying
- Previous by thread: Re: Lying
- Next by thread: Re: Lying
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
