Re: Refresher Course on Social Security
- From: "Jerry Okamura" <okamuraj005@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 07:43:16 -0800
"mg" <mgkelson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1173410035.175824.315600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mar 8, 2:29 pm, "California Poppy" <GoldenStatePo...@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
I am still working part-time for a city rec & park department. They
have their own retirement program rather than SS, which is what I
think all should be. I was given 19 choices of mutual funds. They
are labeled as growth, income, and stability. We were given their 3-
year average % increase. I chose a Conservative Growth Lifestyle
Fund for 50% of my retirement and a Core Bond Fund for 50%, but I
could have chose any fund and any percentage, and I could change any
year. This is what should be available for everyone.
A "city rec & park department" is a government agency that feeds from
the public trough. They're not subject to the ups and downs of the
free-enterprise system. They don't have to make a profit. If you are
suggesting they're system should be extended to private corporations,
you're comparing apples and oranges.
No she is saying that what is good for the goose is good for the gander. She is saying she works for a government agency who offers her an opportunity to invest her money and provide her with a chance to make a better return on her investment.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Refresher Course on Social Security
- From: California Poppy
- Re: Refresher Course on Social Security
- From: Jerry Okamura
- Re: Refresher Course on Social Security
- From: California Poppy
- Re: Refresher Course on Social Security
- From: mg
- Refresher Course on Social Security
- Prev by Date: Re: Refresher Course on Social Security
- Next by Date: Re: Plame = COVERT AGENT
- Previous by thread: Re: Refresher Course on Social Security
- Next by thread: Re: Refresher Course on Social Security
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|