Re: Federal Expenditures
- From: "Jerry Okamura" <okamuraj005@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:20:45 GMT
"Rumpelstiltskin" <PleaseDoNotReplyByEmail@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dvt702lulpuhj2132omn0g1n42fdhrtdqk@xxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 03:55:16 GMT, "Jerry Okamura"
<okamuraj005@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
An article in one of my FRB publications had some interesting information,
that I want to share with you. I have not had the time to analyze this
data, so I do not know exactly what it means. Real per capita Federal
Expenditures seem to have risen very sharply since around 1918 and now
represents around $7,000 per capita. Real per capita Federal
Expenditures
from 1947 through 2002 has risen from a little under 2,000 to around
7,000.
With an 8 trillion dollar debt and 300 million people in the
country, that's $2700 per person just to pay interest on the
debt that's been run up. That's $2700 down the drain, we
don't finance any schools or police forces or roads with it.
Well, yes. If you spend more than you receive, you will incur debt. Not
much differeent that Joe Sixpack, who racks up a lot of credit card debt...
But it seems to me the problem is, everytime someone really wants to address
the problems that are part of the reasons we incur debt at the federal
level, somone else cries bloody murder. For instance, you always argue that
the way to solve the problem is to raise revenue, which is in itself a phony
argument, because raising revenue does do a darn bit of good, if you also
raise expenditures, which is of course what happens.... And of course we
seem to love it when the Federal Government gives us another goody, which of
course means more spending....
.
- References:
- Federal Expenditures
- From: Jerry Okamura
- Re: Federal Expenditures
- From: Rumpelstiltskin
- Federal Expenditures
- Prev by Date: Re: Cocoa and health
- Next by Date: Re: Contact God.
- Previous by thread: Re: Federal Expenditures
- Next by thread: Re: Quote of the day
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|