Re: Wages Up by Smallest Amount in Nine Years
- From: Thumper <jaylsmith@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:23:54 -0500
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:55:43 GMT, "J.C." <jcsplace@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>"Sue" <susanhofftman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:1138724765.617447.75440@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> J.C. wrote:
>>> "Sue" <susanhofftman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:1138719567.870875.57700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> > It has long been known that middle
>>> > and lower level wage earners have not
>>> > done well for decades,
>>>
>>> You would think that with such low pay, they would not be giving up too
>>> much
>>> if they just quit and went to school to gain a higher paying skill.
>>
>> You might suggest disciplines which are economically needed and which
>> the person of an average IQ (100) or below can be expected to master.
>> Half the
>> population has an IQ below 100.
>>
>> Going to school in the academic sense makes no sense, but
>> trade training programs might be better. Plumbers seem to make a good
>> living.
>> But we seem to have too many lawyers! Do you suggest lowering
>> standards
>> so we can have some IQ 90 doctors?
>>
>
>No, I'm suggesting that everyone can find an excuse for their failures.
Another compassionate conservative who looks down at those less
fortunate. There ARE excuses for failure. You look around and see
lesser humans. I look around and see the daily struggle of people who
will never climb out of the position in life they are now in even
though they work harder than you or I.
>I know people that can barely read that are making over $100,000.00 a year in
>a lawn maintenance business, a flea market business, several sustainable
>farming operations, house cleaning businesses, office cleaning businesses.
>The only thing keeping people from earning more money is EXCUSES!
Bull***. You pick out a few anecdotal references to prove your point
.. Are you saying there are 100,000 jobs laying around for everyone if
the just work harder. You make an ass of yourself.
Thumper
.
- References:
- Wages Up by Smallest Amount in Nine Years
- From: Sue
- Re: Wages Up by Smallest Amount in Nine Years
- From: J.C.
- Re: Wages Up by Smallest Amount in Nine Years
- From: Sue
- Re: Wages Up by Smallest Amount in Nine Years
- From: J.C.
- Wages Up by Smallest Amount in Nine Years
- Prev by Date: Re: Wages Up by Smallest Amount in Nine Years
- Next by Date: Re: Wages Up by Smallest Amount in Nine Years
- Previous by thread: Re: Wages Up by Smallest Amount in Nine Years
- Next by thread: Re: Wages Up by Smallest Amount in Nine Years
- Index(es):