Re: Impeachment
- From: Thumper <jaylsmith@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 15:10:44 -0500
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:35:59 -0500, Alan Lichtenstein <arl@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
>Joe wrote:
>> High Miles wrote:
>>
>>> Alan Lichtenstein wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jose wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> High Miles wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jose wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> gamer wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Joe wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How this fool can say the "global war against terrorism" is a
>>>>>>>>> "war of aggression" is pure ignorance unless he is seeing it
>>>>>>>>> from the side of bin Laden. In that case he is right, bin Laden
>>>>>>>>> is conducting a "war of aggression" against democracy.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ?? Since when did Bin Ladin (and Iraq for that matter) have any
>>>>>>>> connection with 9/11 or any US territory terrorism?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hint - the "global war against terrorism" is NOT the same as
>>>>>>>> GW's invasion of Iraq.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hint - It's all part of keeping America safer from terrorism.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hint - When was the last time any terrorist group had a successful
>>>>> strike on American territory?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hint: What is your evidence beyond your conjecture that the war in
>>>> Iraq has prevented such? And for the record, how about the attacks
>>>> in London and in Spain? They don't count?
>>>>
>>>> Please. Wake up and smell the coffee.
>>>>
>>>> Alan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alan - this guy doesn't know that - helloooo - went out twenty
>>> years ago.
>>> And the hint stuff is another clue to his Q.
>>>
>>> And waking him up might make him even more confused.
>>>
>>> D
>>
>>
>> The only thing that would make Alan wake up and smell the coffee would
>> be a terrorist bomb in Princeton, NJ.
>
>Fool, and you are a fool, because you don't move one iota beyond your
>dogmatic ideological cult of personality, if you knew anything, you'd
>understand that we aren't fighting our enemy in Iraq. Our enemy is a
>group of fundamentalist Muslims, who are hell bent on forcing the rest
>of the world to accept their ideology. sort of like what the religious
>right in our own country wants. But the only difference between the
>fundies in the U.S and the fundies in Afghanistan is that the fundies in
>Afghanistan have guns. sorry, let me rephrase that, because the fundies
>in our country have guns too, but at least they're not shooting up their
>adversaries-at least not yet.
>
>You are too stupid to know that before we invaded iraq, there was no
>evidence of terrorist activity in Iraq which was sanctioned by the Iraqi
>Government. In fact, Saddam made efforts to keep at arms length from
>bin Laden. But of course you knew that. But if you didn't surely you
>must have read it in the 9/11 Commission Report? Oh, you didn't read
>that either? Well, fool, for once you might try to evaluate something
>impartially instead of measuring it against the chest-thunping that you
>use to measure everything else.
>
> Alan
You are correct Alan. If he argued that Bush's efforts elsewhere have
helped prevent further attacks he might have a point.
Iraq however is NOT part of the global war on terrorism. There were
no terrorists there before we invaded. Most of those in Iraq using
terrorist methods are iraqis just fighting an invading force as we
would if we were invaded. They are using the means available to them.
There are a few terrorists from other countries in Iraq who can leave
any time and continue terrorizing from elsewhere.
Thumper
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Fear destroys what bin Laden could not
- Next by Date: Re: Canada legalizes sexual orgies
- Previous by thread: Re: Impeachment
- Next by thread: Bay Area Paychecks Highest
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
