Re: How the Unions Killed General Motors

On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 08:58:22 -0800, Sordo  <sordo?@intheknow.com>
wrote:

>GM's Woes Are Homemade, Not Imported
>
>by Daniel T. Griswold
>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=5218
>
>Griswold is director of the Center for Trade Policy Studies at the
>Cato Institute.
>
>If General Motors itself were one big car, its ?check engine? light
>would be flashing. The world?s largest car maker announced this week
>that it plans to shed 30,000 workers by 2008 as its market share and
>stock price continue to slide against a backdrop of unsustainable
>labor costs.
>
>In the past 25 years, GM has seen its share of domestic automobile and
>light truck sales fall from half to a quarter. In the last quarter
>alone, it lost more than $1 billion and its corporate bonds were
>recently downgraded to junk status. The recent job cuts follow years
>of declining employment at the company.
>
>Like the mysterious dash-board signal, the reasons behind GM?s woes
>are open for debate. The United Auto Workers union blames management
>for not developing and promoting more appealing cars. Management
>blames the relatively high cost of its union labor, including generous
>pension and health-care expenditures. And lurking in the background is
>that old bugaboo of allegedly unfair foreign competition.
>
>So far, GM and the other struggling U.S. automaker, Ford, have not
>called explicitly for new trade barriers against imported cars. But
>given the rising rhetoric in Congress against imports from China and
>trade in general, and past U.S. ?voluntary quotas? on Japanese auto
>imports, the possibility of a new backlash against imported cars is
>real. GM is already complaining that Japan is ?manipulating? its
>exchange rate to give its own auto exporters an unfair advantage in
>the U.S. market.
>
>There are plenty of reasons behind the troubles at GM, but ?unfair?
>competition from Japanese automakers is not among them. Japanese
>brands have certainly been gaining market share in the United States,
>but that has arguably more to do with the more appealing design,
>price, and quality of the cars than exchange rates. In fact,
>two-thirds of the Japanese cars Americans buy are not imported from
>Japan but are in fact made in North America, according to the Japan
>Automobile Manufacturers Association, and would not be affected much
>by the exchange rate anyway.
>
>While GM struggles, America?s automobile industry as a whole is doing
>quite well. Last year, American workers in U.S.-based automobile
>plants assembled 12 million cars and light trucks. That compares to an
>average of 10.6 million a year in the decade before enactment of the
>North American Free Trade Agreement in 1994. In the past decade, the
>total volume of automobiles and parts manufactured in the United
>States has grown by 40 percent, according to the Federal Reserve
>Board. All that means that production and jobs have not been shifting
>from GM to rival automakers abroad, but to its rivals inside the
>United States.
>
>Unions and management at GM are both partially right. Union leaders
>are correct that GM?s management has failed to adequately maintain an
>appealing lineup of cars to defend and expand its market share. And
>management is also right that GM?s generous labor contracts have
>saddled the company with extra costs that render too much of its
>product line uncompetitive.
>
>Healthcare costs alone impose an average cost of $1,500 per GM
>vehicle. Unlike most U.S. private-sector workers, GM?s unionized
>workers do not pay deductibles on their health coverage. According to
>the UAW contract in force until 2007, GM?s hourly workers pay only 7
>percent of their total healthcare costs, compared to 27 to 32 percent
>paid by the average U.S. salaried worker. Recent ?concessions? by GM?s
>unions will slow the hemorrhaging, but they may be too little, too
>late.
>
>In contrast, most foreign-owned auto plants in the United States are
>non-unionized. Their workers are not as generously compensated as GM?s
>workers, but they are relatively well-paid with good benefits. And
>because their employers are not saddled with the uneconomic pension
>and healthcare costs of a UAW contract, they can produce cars at a
>more competitive price, creating more opportunity and job security for
>existing workers. Michigan-based GM?s toughest competition these days
>is not from Japan, but from Ohio, Kentucky, Tennessee, Mississippi,
>South Carolina and the other states where foreign-owned auto companies
>have established production facilities.
>
>Trade barriers and harangues about exchange rates won?t save GM from
>itself and its unions. In an internationally competitive domestic
>market, GM will need to earn back its market share the old fashioned
>way: by controlling its costs and by producing cool cars at a price
>that more Americans are willing to pay.


What a crock of shit. If the $1500 per car health care costs were
gone tomorrow, GM would still be floundering because they simply do
not have a product that the public wants. Compare foreign and
domestic lines and you will see that foreign car prices are often
higher than GMs domestic prices. People are willing to pay premium
prices for Honda, Toyota, Subaru because they get want they want and
the product is more reliable.

Union concessions will only take the place of GM facing up to their
true problems and give them a reprieve from fixing their company in
the short term.
Thumper
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A Modern Parable
    ... development of a new canoe, sold all the paddles, and canceled all ... workers there voted it that way. ... years and labor costs only account for 10% of the cost of a vehicle. ... My past experience with American made cars was good up till the late ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: A Modern Parable
    ... development of a new canoe, sold all the paddles, and canceled all ... workers there voted it that way. ... years and labor costs only account for 10% of the cost of a vehicle. ... My past experience with American made cars was good up till the late ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Bailing Out Detroit
    ... Japanese companies who manufacture cars in nonunion plants. ... a big chunk of that figure comes from legacy retiree ... costs, and retiree costs are high not because retiree benefits are ... and Chrysler workers make significantly more than their counterparts ...
    (misc.news.internet.discuss)
  • Re: American Capitalism is like American Automobiles
    ... then when it has a major breakdown down it costs a bundle. ... Now they are claiming that SUVs were simply what the market said that it wanted - they were just responding to the market! ... How many massive recalls have you seen in Japanese cars? ... With a new design, they are going to have to go down a new learning curve, hopefully without introducing new dangers to their customers. ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: American Capitalism is like American Automobiles
    ... then when it has a major breakdown down it costs a bundle. ... what is best for the market. ... How many massive recalls have you seen in Japanese cars? ... introducing new dangers to their customers. ...
    (soc.retirement)