Re: Time to cut our dependence on and therefore our interest in the...
- From: "Jerry Okamura" <okamuraj005@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 19:41:56 GMT
"Alan Lichtenstein" <arl@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:DN6dnWBjbpWCgpveRVn-jw@xxxxxxxxxx
> Olly Mensch wrote:
>
>> Paul - surely you know the answer to your own question; it is not so
>> complex or new- or different. People -= all of us - some more, some
>> less - are driven by all kinds of motives to do what we do; not always
>> very sensible. But we are free to do so,and industry is free to respond
>> to our foolishness,and pesent us with what they believe we want. Or even
>> vice versa.
>> It does not take an Einstein to figure that out - or to question it,
>> even though no one forces you to like it!.
>> Olly
>
> Yes, Olly, we are all free to do what we want just so long as our pursuit
> of our freedom doesn't impinge on someone else's pursuit of their freedom.
> When we have a finite resource, such as oil, we cannot permit those who
> have money to waste the resource, because it impinges on the remainder of
> the population. Consequently, your argument fails that test, because if
> we allow people to purchase SUV's when they have no real need for the
> vehicles simply because they can, then their pursuit of freedom does
> impinge on everyone else's.
>
Nice sentiments, but just about impossible to achieve it seems to me, i.e.
pursuing our freedom which does not impinge on someone else's pursuit of
their freedom. As for who we "allow" to utilize a limited resource such as
oil, it seems to me that includes all of us who use that oil, not only those
who sell that oil. For that matter, if there were not people who are
willing to buy that oil, then there would not be people who produce and sell
the oil. As for the SUV argument, that also seems to me to apply to a whole
bunch of things we use. For example, since all of us are retired on this
newsgroup, do we all really need to have spent our earths valuable
resources, using the very computer we are now using? Think about what raw
materials that were used in the construction of this "toy"? How about the
electericity that is consumed while we are using this "toy"? And this toy
only lasts a couple of years before it is replaced, either because it does
not work well anymore, or because we want something that is a little
faster....wasting valuable resources perhaps? You should come to my house
and take a look in my garage....quite an accumulation of old computers,
displays and other computer stuff that no longer works. Do you travel? How
much "limited" resources does that require? If no one travelled for
pleasure, how much resources would we save?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Time to cut our dependence on and therefore our interest in the...
- From: Alan Lichtenstein
- Re: Time to cut our dependence on and therefore our interest in the...
- References:
- Re: Time to cut our dependence on and therefore our interest in the...
- From: bforester
- Re: Time to cut our dependence on and therefore our interest in the...
- From: Olly Mensch
- Re: Time to cut our dependence on and therefore our interest in the...
- From: Alan Lichtenstein
- Re: Time to cut our dependence on and therefore our interest in the...
- Prev by Date: Re: Time to cut our dependence on and therefore our interest in the...
- Next by Date: Re: Like Father, Like Son - "I'm determined that life goes on, " Pres. Bush said stubbornly on his long vacation during the LAST war with Iraq!
- Previous by thread: Re: Time to cut our dependence on and therefore our interest in the...
- Next by thread: Re: Time to cut our dependence on and therefore our interest in the...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|