Re: Why meteorology belongs on SRQ

On Jul 1, 2:41 pm, Tom McDonald <kilt...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 1, 10:46 am, Meteorologist <dchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Jun 25, 6:07 pm, Tom McDonald <kilt...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jun 25, 9:47 am, Meteorologist <dchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In forums at Cambridge Meeting USA the common
misconception is that the climate science is
settled.  This is not true.

So, as a result, I have placed numerous topics
dealing with climate change on SRQ the past
few months.

It makes the point that consensus is a long
way off.

"Meteorology is the interdisciplinary scientific study of the
atmosphere that focuses on weather processes and forecasting (in
contrast with climatology)."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meteorology

I don't understand how Tom McDonald is replying to
me here if he actually killfiles all my posts.

I don't have you killfiled on GGs.

If anybody has an interest in meteorology and wants
to talk about it on SRQ, I am happy to oblige.

Why? You say you want to talk meteorology, but confuse meteorology
with climatology.

There is no such confusion on my part.

If you can't get that straight, there is no use
conversing with you.

You are out of line here. There is an opportunity
for mutual benefit.

Although, even if you did get the distinction right, there would still
be no conversing with you, since you don't do conversation.

Just saying so on your part does not make
it true.

Also, you presumably know I am writing a
book on how good-hearted people may become
stewards of the earth.

David Christainsen

.