Re: iRFD: A moderated SRQ?
- From: Sir David <sirdavid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 14:02:01 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 27, 3:42 pm, crunch <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Did you know I was once a Moderator for four years
on a certain Yahoo Group?
How could anyone miss it? You've been bragging about it for years,
even though it was a total failure.
IMHO Option 1 is best for SRQ; Option 2 could be done
to some extent by those who play at quakerism, as Ian
Davis recently put it.
Did you know that I play at quakerism?
Did you know that the whole reason for a proposed moderated group is
to EXCLUDE YOU from trolling and riding your hobbyhorse? Of course you
did. So your own thoughts on the matter are irrelevant. You won't be
involved. Sucks to be you.
The example of this behaviour on
your part was the asking of 10 questions on Thiering Thesis
on a part of the Crucifixion because you wanted to expose
me as DISHONEST.
And you were thus exposed; as DISHONEST. And a hobbyhorse-riding
craclkpot kook. Sucks to be you.