Re: Truth is not really threatened by error; only the error is actually vulnerable
- From: ijdavis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ian Davis)
- Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 23:23:38 +0000 (UTC)
In article <3a5e3cda-8daa-4915-b671-41bcc0992390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<<Kelly>> <<Kelly> wrote:
On Dec 19, 12:13 pm, crunch <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The past with Engineer is over; a brave new world awaits...
I didn't ask if the past was over.. I asked what happened!
I counted him a friend and only returned here because when I was told of his
departure it seemed that I must needs return, if only to defend his good name.
Am I not entitled to be told why he left, by the one most likely to be able
to say?
Ian
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Truth is not really threatened by error; only the error is actually vulnerable
- From: crunch
- Re: Truth is not really threatened by error; only the error is actually vulnerable
- From: Ian Davis
- Re: Truth is not really threatened by error; only the error is actually vulnerable
- From: crunch
- Re: Truth is not really threatened by error; only the error is actually vulnerable
- From: (<<Kelly>>)
- Truth is not really threatened by error; only the error is actually vulnerable
- Prev by Date: Re: The End of Faith
- Next by Date: Re: For Christmas bid strife and discord cease
- Previous by thread: Re: Truth is not really threatened by error; only the error is actually vulnerable
- Next by thread: Re: Truth is not really threatened by error; only the error is actually vulnerable
- Index(es):