Re: The real history of the gospel period
- From: Seebs <usenet-nospam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 05 Oct 2009 23:11:02 GMT
On 2009-10-05, crunch <pchristainsen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Howsoever, whenever YOU get serious, I highly
recommend it as formidable and serious scholarship.
Yeah, and if I ever decide to seriously take up physics as my lifetime's
study, I'll get a copy of the Feynman lectures... But it's not my lifetime's
study, and I don't think I have a copy, nor much interest in reading them at
the moment.
Relevance is: I am not at this point particularly interested in putting
a lot of work into this topic. If you want people to care about this
enough to do the hard slogging through scholarly works you feel is needed,
then you're going to have to start by putting in a tiny bit of your own
work, and explain, in your own words, without relying on links or cut
and paste excerpts, why they should care.
-s
--
Copyright 2009, all wrongs reversed. Peter Seebach / usenet-nospam@xxxxxxxxx
http://www.seebs.net/log/ <-- lawsuits, religion, and funny pictures
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Game_(Scientology) <-- get educated!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The real history of the gospel period
- From: Ian Davis
- Re: The real history of the gospel period
- References:
- Re: The real history of the gospel period
- From: Seebs
- Re: The real history of the gospel period
- From: crunch
- Re: The real history of the gospel period
- Prev by Date: Re: The real history of the gospel period
- Next by Date: Re: Some day a SRQ correspondent will come along who actually understands me
- Previous by thread: Re: The real history of the gospel period
- Next by thread: Re: The real history of the gospel period
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
