Re: I will entertain informed questions on Thiering pesher
- From: crunch <pchristainsen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:33:36 -0700 (PDT)
On Aug 27, 3:08 pm, <<kêllÿ>> <rosie_be...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 27, 11:40 am, crunch <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yet, OTOH it is honorable to retire from usenet teaching
This is a good example of more of your narcissistic deluional
thinking.
You are flat-out crazy.
You can't "retire" from something you've never done,
Soggy. You've never been considered by anyone (other than yourself)
to be a "Usenet teacher", therefore, you cannot "retire" from it.
You are so lazy that here you fail to check
usenet archives across all NGs over the past
12 years for the teaching on the Thiering Thesis
that I did. You are in love with your own faulty
logic.
Moral compass is important but one should be
flexible to cover special situations within the
educational category for education's sake.
Translation of Soggy-speak: "I stay moral only until I need to cover
my tracks - then I will act immorally in order to save myself to m
own narcissistic satisfaction and fulfillment of my narcissistic
supply."
Mistranslation by Kelly as usual.
President Clinton showed me the right way during
his Administrations for getting out of a stick situation
with honor.
Lying is what he did. As much as I like Bill Clinton and liked him as
a president, he still lied in order to get out of the Lewinsky
situation.
No, Bill Clinton did not lie about it. Instead, he
employed sharp practise by being super-precise
in his wording like the lawyer he was (depends
on the meaning of "is"). I concede in advance
that the American people do NOT need such
a president in the context of moral example.
Apparently, you did learn from Clinton - you lie.
All the time.
Your understanding of what I post is next to nothing.
(Yeah sure, you apparently know Brubeck jazz.)
And everyone here knows it.
Actually, the reverse is mostly true. People do not
respect you here because you show yourself not
to be a straight shooter.
He would admit that mistakes had been made but
would move on from there for corrective action.
And that is something you don't do. I have never seen you
"admit...mistakes" in Usenet.
I never made any mistakes (that I know of) in 12 years on
usenet in reporting on the Thiering Thesis for what it is.
(My reporting let the reader make up his or her own mind.)
You remain a delusional, self-serving, narcissistic weaselly coward
and liar.
Instead, on usenet my posts are polite and
informative. If you don't believe me, please
check my sci.archaeology posts in their volume
over the past 2 months when you have a week
to kill.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: I will entertain informed questions on Thiering pesher
- From: Ian Davis
- Re: I will entertain informed questions on Thiering pesher
- References:
- I will entertain informed questions on Thiering pesher
- From: crunch
- Re: I will entertain informed questions on Thiering pesher
- From: Yowie
- Re: I will entertain informed questions on Thiering pesher
- From: crunch
- Re: I will entertain informed questions on Thiering pesher
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: I will entertain informed questions on Thiering pesher
- From: Ian Davis
- Re: I will entertain informed questions on Thiering pesher
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: I will entertain informed questions on Thiering pesher
- From: crunch
- Re: I will entertain informed questions on Thiering pesher
- From: <<kêllÿ>>
- I will entertain informed questions on Thiering pesher
- Prev by Date: Re: I will entertain informed questions on Thiering pesher
- Next by Date: Re: I will entertain informed questions on Thiering pesher
- Previous by thread: Re: I will entertain informed questions on Thiering pesher
- Next by thread: Re: I will entertain informed questions on Thiering pesher
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|