Re: I strongly object to how much SRQ has degraded
- From: Ian <ian.groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 02:25:24 -0700
On 29 Aug, 09:36, David <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks for your opinion. Contrary to it, I am looking for a few open
minds,
which I don't expect to find on SRQ but may find on sci.archaeology
and soc.history.ancient on the Th**r*ng Thesis.
Is your mind open, friend? What would it take to convince you that you
(and your guru) are wrong?
Ian
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- I strongly object to how much SRQ has degraded
- From: David
- Re: I strongly object to how much SRQ has degraded
- From: John
- Re: I strongly object to how much SRQ has degraded
- From: David
- Re: I strongly object to how much SRQ has degraded
- From: Yowie
- Re: I strongly object to how much SRQ has degraded
- From: David
- Re: I strongly object to how much SRQ has degraded
- From: Yowie
- Re: I strongly object to how much SRQ has degraded
- From: David
- Re: I strongly object to how much SRQ has degraded
- From: Whiskers
- Re: I strongly object to how much SRQ has degraded
- From: David
- Re: I strongly object to how much SRQ has degraded
- From: Yowie
- Re: I strongly object to how much SRQ has degraded
- From: David
- Re: I strongly object to how much SRQ has degraded
- From: Ian
- Re: I strongly object to how much SRQ has degraded
- From: David
- I strongly object to how much SRQ has degraded
- Prev by Date: Re: Maybe SRQ did not degrade as much as I thought...
- Next by Date: Re: ADD
- Previous by thread: Re: I strongly object to how much SRQ has degraded
- Next by thread: Re: I strongly object to how much SRQ has degraded
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|