Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: Ian <ian.groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:11:01 -0700
On 16 Aug, 19:11, David <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You don't show you have any conversation for the thread topic.
We went through all this in your attempts to get us discussion
Th**r*ng and marriage. Why should any of us bother to join a
"conversation" which consists of you proposing a topic and then
playing no further role except to criticise the contributions of
others?
All you have said that's vaguely on topic is that they can't be
uninvented. So what? Where do /you/ think humanity should go from
here?
Ian
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: David
- Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: David
- Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: Engineer
- Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: David
- Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: Yowie
- Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: David
- Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: Yowie
- Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: David
- Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- Prev by Date: Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- Next by Date: Re: ADD (was: Re: Understanding The Libertarian Philosophy)
- Previous by thread: Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- Next by thread: Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
