Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: David <pchristainsen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:11:13 -0700
On Aug 15, 11:48 pm, "Yowie" <yowie9644.DIESPAM...@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"David" <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1187230689.109934.122950@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Aug 15, 8:05 pm, "Yowie" <yowie9644.DIESPAM...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"David" <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1187033317.709478.129340@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Aug 12, 9:28 pm, Engineer <inva...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
David wrote:
I did not write the above.
It was the sci.crypt attacker.
The person attacking sci.crypt is copying names and subjects in
many, many newsgroups, still hoping to get people to crosspost
replies to sci.crypt. As long as we remain a poor source for such
crossposts, I expect only the occasional forgery.
(This post was needed to impart technical information. It should
not be interpreted as a desire to have anything to do with the
particular individual that the attacker pretended to be.)
You did not do any addressing of the issue of nuclear weapons.
When you are on a public forum, you will never get your wish.
Yowie
You are turning yourself into a first-class polemicist
Thankyou. I thought I was already there, but hey, no big deal.
for no good
reason.
What is a 'good' reason?
Have you ever heard of the style guide for Internet Discussion Groups
that
Engineer has mentioned on SRQ already?
I'd heard of them and even read them long before I ever came here. I've been
posting to usenet since 1996, and was posting to Fidonet as early as 1989.
Still, I can't see the relevance of 'style guides' to the above exchange.
Yowie- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
You don't show you have any conversation for the thread topic.
World peace will certainly take a heroic group effort to achieve.
Let's get started.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: David
- Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: David
- Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: Engineer
- Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: David
- Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: Yowie
- Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: David
- Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- From: Yowie
- Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- Prev by Date: Re: ADD (was: Re: Understanding The Libertarian Philosophy)
- Next by Date: Re: ADD (was: Re: Understanding The Libertarian Philosophy)
- Previous by thread: Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- Next by thread: Re: Does the issue of nuclear weapons need to be addressed?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
